2026: Trump's dream year?
I put the chance of Trump’s 2026 “bull case” at about 11%, higher than the market but still clearly a low-probability outcome. The market looks too pessimistic if the event is defined broadly, though not by an enormous amount.
Analysis
With no detailed definition of what qualifies as the “bull case,” the main question is whether Trump can produce a year in 2026 that credibly looks like a political, economic, or strategic win. That is not impossible: he could benefit from a favorable macro backdrop, judicial or legislative victories, weaker opposition, foreign-policy wins, or a successful messaging environment that makes his agenda look durable. In a broad framing, there are multiple paths to a positive outcome, and the time horizon gives enough room for a surprise run of favorable developments.
Against that, the baseline remains unfavorable because 2026 is likely to be shaped by the usual constraints on second-term presidencies: high polarization, limited legislative bandwidth, and the risk that any gains are offset by inflation, market volatility, legal setbacks, or foreign-policy disappointments. Trump also tends to generate strong reactions in both directions, which means even objectively positive developments may not translate into a clear “bull case” narrative. If the market’s definition requires a clean, unambiguous success story, that is harder to achieve than a casual reading of the headline suggests.
The current market price of 4.9% implies an even stronger belief that the favorable outcome is very unlikely. I think that is somewhat too low if the event is interpreted loosely, because a single strong political or economic run in 2026 could plausibly qualify. Still, the event probably deserves a low single-digit-to-low-teens probability rather than anything materially higher, because the burden of proof is on a broad, sustained, and recognizable win across a full year.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: A single strong year of economic or political outcomes could be enough to support a bullish Trump narrative in 2026.
- Arguments for Yes: The market may be discounting the possibility of an unexpectedly favorable alignment of policy, courts, and public sentiment.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: The default environment for a highly polarized presidency makes a clean bull-case year difficult to achieve.
- Arguments against Yes: If the market requires a broad and unmistakable success story, the definition is likely stricter than a simple one-off positive event.
Key drivers
- The outcome depends heavily on how broadly the market defines Trump’s “bull case,” which could make the event easier or harder to satisfy than it appears.
- Trump has multiple pathways to a favorable 2026 narrative, including economic strength, policy wins, or external events that validate his agenda.
Risk factors
- A weak economy, market downturn, or inflation flare-up would quickly undermine any bullish narrative.
- Legal, political, or foreign-policy setbacks could keep 2026 from looking like a clear success even if there are isolated wins.
Scenarios
Best case
Trump gets a run of economic, judicial, or geopolitical wins that make 2026 look like a clear validation of his agenda and political strength.
Most likely
Trump has a mixed year with some tactical wins but enough headwinds that the overall narrative remains contested rather than decisively bullish.
Worst case
2026 is marked by setbacks, volatility, and persistent controversy, leaving no credible basis for calling it a bull case year.
More from this day
- economyPolymarket3mo
How many Fed rate cuts in 2026?
AI11%MKT93%Edge-82HypedI think there is still a meaningful chance of at least one Fed cut in 2026, but the market is pricing in a very strong hold case for a reason. My estimate is that there is about an 11% chance of no rate cuts at all in 2026.
- techPolymarket3mo
How many more Millennium Prize Problems will AI solve in 2026?
AI88%MKT19%Edge+69Hidden GemI think there is a strong chance that no qualifying Millennium Prize Problems will be counted for 2026 under this market’s rules, even though OpenAI’s Navier-Stokes claim makes the broader “AI solved a Millennium Problem” narrative look more plausible. The exclusion of Navier-Stokes from resolution is the key reason the zero-solved outcome still looks likelier than not.
- FinancialsKalshi13y
Will OpenAI or Anthropic IPO first?
AI34%MKT95%Edge-61HypedMy independent view is that OpenAI is less likely than the market implies to be the first of the two to IPO. The current reporting tilt favors Anthropic moving earlier, and OpenAI’s process appears more valuation- and timing-constrained.