How many Fed rate cuts in 2026?
I think there is still a meaningful chance of at least one Fed cut in 2026, but the market is pricing in a very strong hold case for a reason. My estimate is that there is about an 11% chance of no rate cuts at all in 2026.
Analysis
The market is asking whether the Fed will finish all of 2026 without any cuts, and the current price implies that outcome is considered highly likely. A 93% yes price means traders are effectively saying the most plausible path is continued policy restraint, either because inflation remains sticky, growth stays solid enough to avoid pressure, or the Fed prefers to wait for clearer disinflation before easing. That is a defensible baseline, especially this late in the year, because the Fed tends to move slowly when it is uncertain and because one or two upcoming meetings can easily pass without action if data are mixed.
Against that, it is hard to ignore that the market only needs one 25 bp cut for this bet to lose, and by September there are still enough decision points left for the Fed to react if the economy weakens even modestly. The key issue is not whether the Fed is ready to launch a deep easing cycle, but whether conditions deteriorate enough to force a single symbolic cut. Labor market softness, slower real activity, or a calmer inflation trend could all be enough to justify one cut before year-end, especially if policymakers want to avoid staying too restrictive for too long. That makes the no-cut outcome plausible, but not nearly as close to certain as the market price suggests.
Historical Fed behavior also argues against treating a zero-cut year as the default once the economy starts showing disinflation and policy is still restrictive. The Fed often waits for confidence, but it also tends to move once the balance of risks shifts toward growth or employment, and it usually does not need a crisis to begin trimming rates. If inflation cools and unemployment edges higher, even slightly, the committee can choose to cut once and then pause. On the other hand, if growth remains resilient and inflation proves stubborn into the final meetings, the Fed could indeed finish 2026 unchanged. My assessment is that the no-cut scenario is credible, but the probability of at least one cut is still materially higher than the current market-implied odds would suggest.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: The Fed may judge that inflation risks still outweigh growth risks and prefer to keep rates unchanged all year.
- Arguments for Yes: If the economy remains resilient into the final meetings, policymakers may see no need to spend credibility on a small preventive cut.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: The Fed can easily deliver one 25 bp cut if labor market conditions soften or inflation trends improve further.
- Arguments against Yes: With several meetings left in 2026, the remaining policy window is long enough for one small easing move without requiring a recession.
Key drivers
- The Fed only needs one 25 bp cut for this market to fail, so a modest deterioration in labor or growth data would be enough.
- A continued inflation drift lower would strengthen the case for a precautionary cut before year-end.
Risk factors
- Sticky core inflation could keep the Fed on hold through all remaining meetings.
- Strong growth and a stable labor market would reduce pressure for any easing in 2026.
Scenarios
Best case
Inflation stays sticky, growth remains solid, and the Fed keeps rates unchanged at every remaining 2026 meeting, making the no-cut outcome true.
Most likely
The Fed stays patient for several meetings, but the data mix eventually turns just soft enough to produce at least one small cut before year-end.
Worst case
Incoming data weaken enough to prompt a 25 bp cut at one of the remaining meetings, immediately defeating the no-cut bet.
More from this day
- techPolymarket3mo
How many more Millennium Prize Problems will AI solve in 2026?
AI88%MKT19%Edge+69Hidden GemI think there is a strong chance that no qualifying Millennium Prize Problems will be counted for 2026 under this market’s rules, even though OpenAI’s Navier-Stokes claim makes the broader “AI solved a Millennium Problem” narrative look more plausible. The exclusion of Navier-Stokes from resolution is the key reason the zero-solved outcome still looks likelier than not.
- FinancialsKalshi13y
Will OpenAI or Anthropic IPO first?
AI34%MKT95%Edge-61HypedMy independent view is that OpenAI is less likely than the market implies to be the first of the two to IPO. The current reporting tilt favors Anthropic moving earlier, and OpenAI’s process appears more valuation- and timing-constrained.
- PoliticsKalshi2y
Who will Trump pardon?
AI4%MKT51%Edge-47HypedI see a very low probability that Barron Trump receives a presidential pardon before January 21, 2029. The market’s 50% pricing looks far too high unless one assumes an unusual future criminal exposure that is not supported by the current facts.