US real GDP growth in 2035?
I think the most likely 2035 outcome is a moderate-growth year centered around 2% to 2.5% real GDP growth, with recession-risk tails still material but not dominant. My independent view is modestly more optimistic than the market on the upper-middle growth bands.
Analysis
Looking at 2035 from a long-horizon macro perspective, the center of gravity for U.S. real GDP growth still appears to be in the low-to-mid 2% range. The U.S. economy has historically clustered around roughly 2% trend real growth over long spans, and by 2035 the balance between demographic drag and productivity gains should still leave the economy capable of occasional years in the 2.1% to 2.5% band. That makes the leading contender a plausible modal outcome, especially if AI-related capital deepening and productivity improvements continue to translate into measured output gains rather than simply offsetting slower labor-force growth. On the other hand, the probability mass below 2% remains substantial because mature expansions often undershoot trend, and a long-run forecast decade out must assign real weight to recession years and subpar recoveries.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: The U.S. economy can still deliver a 2% to 2.5% real growth year even in a mature expansion, especially with productivity support.
- Arguments for Yes: Structural investment in automation and AI may boost measured output enough to make the 2.1% to 2.5% bin the most likely single outcome.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: Trend growth over the long run has been close to 2%, so the 1.6% to 2.0% band may be more common than the market implies.
- Arguments against Yes: The downside distribution is fat-tailed because recessions remain possible over a decade-long horizon.
Key drivers
- Long-run U.S. trend growth still clusters near 2% real GDP, making the 2.1% to 2.5% band the natural center of the distribution.
- AI and productivity gains could lift 2035 growth above the post-financial-crisis average if they diffuse broadly into the economy.
- A mature business cycle and recession tail risk keep the 0.0% or below and 0.6% to 1.0% bins meaningful even if not dominant.
Risk factors
- Demographic aging and weaker labor-force growth can keep actual growth stuck below the optimistic middle bands.
- A recession or policy shock in the early 2030s could pull the annual 2035 reading into the zero-or-below range.
Scenarios
Best case
Productivity growth accelerates and labor efficiency gains persist, pushing 2035 into the 2.6% to 3.0% range or higher.
Most likely
The economy grows at a moderate pace, with 2.1% to 2.5% slightly ahead of 1.6% to 2.0% and a meaningful chance of a weaker year.
Worst case
A recession or prolonged slowdown hits the 2035 measurement year, putting GDP growth at 0.0% or below.
Outcomes
| Outcome | AI | MKT |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1% to 2.5% | 18% | 14% |
| 1.6% to 2.0% | 22% | 13% |
| 0.0% or Below | 14% | 12% |
| 2.6% to 3.0% | 16% | 11% |
| 0.6% to 1.0% | 10% | 8% |
More from this day
- economyPolymarket3mo
How many Fed rate cuts in 2026?
AI11%MKT93%Edge-82HypedI think there is still a meaningful chance of at least one Fed cut in 2026, but the market is pricing in a very strong hold case for a reason. My estimate is that there is about an 11% chance of no rate cuts at all in 2026.
- techPolymarket3mo
How many more Millennium Prize Problems will AI solve in 2026?
AI88%MKT19%Edge+69Hidden GemI think there is a strong chance that no qualifying Millennium Prize Problems will be counted for 2026 under this market’s rules, even though OpenAI’s Navier-Stokes claim makes the broader “AI solved a Millennium Problem” narrative look more plausible. The exclusion of Navier-Stokes from resolution is the key reason the zero-solved outcome still looks likelier than not.
- FinancialsKalshi13y
Will OpenAI or Anthropic IPO first?
AI34%MKT95%Edge-61HypedMy independent view is that OpenAI is less likely than the market implies to be the first of the two to IPO. The current reporting tilt favors Anthropic moving earlier, and OpenAI’s process appears more valuation- and timing-constrained.