Will Trump abolish the Department of Education?
I put the chance of the Department of Education being formally eliminated before Jan. 20, 2029 at 11%. The administration can keep weakening and reallocating functions, but full abolition still looks politically and procedurally difficult.
Analysis
The strongest argument for a Yes outcome is that the administration is already doing much of the practical work of dismantling the department’s role. Staff cuts, interagency agreements, and the announced transfer of major responsibilities such as special education oversight show that the executive branch is willing to keep pushing boundaries, and House Republicans have at least shown interest in codifying some of those transfers. That means the policy direction is not hypothetical; it is already underway in partial form.
The main obstacle is that formal elimination is not the same as administrative shrinkage. The available reporting is clear that abolishing the department requires Congress, and the Senate is already showing meaningful resistance through bipartisan pushback. Even if House Republicans remain aligned with Trump, the Senate filibuster, intraparty divisions, and the likelihood that Trump would not easily accept a law that truly abolishes a cabinet department all make enacted repeal a high bar. The current evidence points more to fragmentation of functions than to clean legal liquidation.
Against the current market price of 16%, I think the market is somewhat too optimistic on Yes. I agree that the over-under is not zero because a future Congress could change hands, the administration could keep building a legal and political record for restructuring, and a broader conservative governing wave could make abolition more plausible. But the most likely endpoint is continued hollowing-out, litigation, and partial transfers, not a full statutory elimination before January 2029.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: The administration has already moved major responsibilities and staffing out of the department, showing a real willingness to keep dismantling it.
- Arguments for Yes: House Republicans have shown some support for codifying interagency transfers, which could be a stepping stone toward broader abolition.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: The Senate has already mounted bipartisan resistance, and formal abolition still needs legislation that can survive the chamber.
- Arguments against Yes: Trump is more likely to continue weakening the department than to secure the difficult political coalition needed to eliminate it outright.
Key drivers
- Abolition requires legislation, which makes the Senate the binding constraint rather than the president’s unilateral intent.
- The administration is already transferring functions out of the department, which increases the chance of partial dismantling but not necessarily full elimination.
Risk factors
- A future Republican trifecta or filibuster change could make a formal abolition bill unexpectedly viable.
- Courts or Congress could validate enough restructuring that market participants overcount the odds of a technical elimination.
Scenarios
Best case
Republicans gain enough congressional control and procedural flexibility to pass a bill abolishing the department, or to enact a near-total legal replacement that counts as elimination before 2029.
Most likely
The administration continues stripping duties and resources from the department, but Congress never passes a clean abolition bill, so the department remains in existence on Jan. 20, 2029.
Worst case
The department survives as a legal entity while losing functions and staff, with only piecemeal transfers and no final abolition.
More from this day
- CompaniesKalshi1y
Starbucks total global stores in 2026
AI89%MKT9%Edge+80Hidden GemStarbucks looks likely to finish 2026 above 41,800 stores. The company’s reported Q3 base of 41,304 and full-year guidance for 600 to 650 net new coffeehouses leave a meaningful cushion over the threshold.
- PoliticsKalshi1y
2026: Trump's bad year?
AI73%MKT11%Edge+62Hidden GemTrump looks materially more likely than not to have a genuinely adverse 2026, with legal exposure, court fights, and internal political resistance creating several paths to a bad year. The market’s 11% yes price looks far too low unless the event is defined very narrowly.
- FinancialsKalshi13y
Will OpenAI or Anthropic IPO first?
AI30%MKT82%Edge-52HypedI estimate OpenAI has only about a 30% chance of beating Anthropic to the IPO. Anthropic’s reported late-2026 target and OpenAI’s apparent drift toward 2027 make Anthropic the likelier first mover.