2026: Trump's bad year?
The bear case for Trump in 2026 is highly probable due to a convergence of Supreme Court defeats on tariffs and executive power, unprecedented judicial rebukes of his policies, and immediate legal backlash over the 90% reduction of Utah national monuments signed just days ago.
Analysis
The bear case for Trump in 2026 is already materializing through a series of concrete legal and political failures that define a 'bad year.' The Supreme Court has invalidated Trump's extensive tariffs enacted under emergency powers, a ruling that affirms lower court decisions limiting his authority and carries significant global repercussions. Simultaneously, lower court judges across the country are increasingly issuing decisive rulings blocking his initiatives on immigration, tariffs, and DOJ prosecutions, with a Washington Post analysis noting he defied judges in roughly one-third of all cases against him by mid-July. This judicial resistance is unprecedented for any presidential administration and directly undermines his policy agenda.
The most immediate catalyst for the bear case occurred just eight days ago on July 13, 2026, when Trump signed proclamations slashing Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments by roughly 90%, cutting approximately 3 million acres. Legal scholars argue this action violates the Antiquities Act, which grants presidents power to create but not dismantle monuments, making the cuts highly vulnerable to federal court reversal. Conservation groups and Tribal leaders are already preparing lawsuits, and the move has triggered significant political backlash even within Republican Utah, where 71% of voters oppose the cuts. This combination of statutory overreach and immediate litigation creates a high probability of a legal defeat that will dominate the news cycle for the remainder of the year.
The current market price of 9.9% for 'Yes' appears severely mispriced, likely underestimating the cumulative impact of these confirmed events. The market may be reacting to Trump's political resilience or the fact that the year is only halfway over, but the evidence of a 'bear case' is not speculative; it is documented in Supreme Court rulings, district court blockades, and active lawsuits filed within the current year. With the Justice Department losing at least a dozen election lawsuits and Trump facing a trial against the BBC set for February 2027, the trajectory for 2026 is one of consistent legal rebuffs rather than political triumph. The convergence of these factors suggests the probability of the bear case occurring is far higher than the market implies.
Arguments
For
- Supreme Court has already invalidated Trump's tariffs, confirming a major legal defeat
- Federal judges are blocking significant initiatives on immigration and tariffs with unprecedented frequency
- The Utah monument cuts are legally vulnerable under the Antiquities Act and face immediate lawsuits
- Trump defied judges in roughly one-third of all cases against him by mid-July 2026
Against
- Trump retains strong political support which may buffer the impact of legal losses
- Some lower court rulings could be overturned on appeal before the year ends
- The market may be pricing in a potential legislative breakthrough that could reverse the bear narrative
- The BBC trial is in 2027, so that specific liability does not directly impact the 2026 outcome
Key drivers
- Supreme Court invalidation of Trump's tariffs and emergency powers
- Unprecedented rate of lower court judges blocking Trump's executive actions
- Immediate legal backlash and statutory violation risks from 90% Utah monument cuts
- Justice Department losing at least a dozen election lawsuits
Risk factors
- Trump may successfully appeal lower court rulings to the Supreme Court before year-end
- Political support from base could mitigate the impact of legal defeats on his overall standing
- The monument cuts might be defended successfully if the Antiquities Act interpretation shifts
- Market may overcorrect if Trump achieves a major legislative victory in the coming months
Scenarios
Best case
Trump successfully appeals the tariff ruling and the monument cuts are upheld or settled without a court reversal, allowing him to claim a victory and shift focus to legislative achievements.
Most likely
Trump continues to face a string of court defeats including the monument cuts being blocked, the tariff ruling remains in effect, and the Justice Department loses more election lawsuits, cementing 2026 as a year of legal and political setbacks.
Worst case
The Supreme Court or lower courts issue a final, binding reversal on the monument cuts, the tariff ruling is expanded to block other emergency powers, and Trump faces a major financial judgment or indictment before 2027.
More from this day
- PoliticsKalshi2y
Which agencies will Trump eliminate?
AI100%MKT29%Edge+71Hidden GemUSAID has already been eliminated as an independent agency in July 2025, with its functions absorbed into the State Department, making the 'Yes' outcome certain.
- HealthKalshi2y
What will the average number of measles cases be during Trump's term?
AI88%MKT32%Edge+56Hidden GemThe average measles cases per year during Trump's term will exceed 2,300, making the 'Yes' outcome (average above this threshold) highly probable at approximately 88%.
- pop culturePolymarketEnded
"The Odyssey" 2nd Weekend Box Office
AI66%MKT11%Edge+55Hidden GemThe most likely outcome is that The Odyssey’s second weekend lands below $74M, but the margin is not huge because tracking reaches the threshold exactly. The market’s 91% Yes-implied probability looks a bit too high, though the underlying box office signals still favor a sub-$74M result.