Will Trump end the Federal Reserve?
Trump cannot end the Federal Reserve before January 20, 2029 because abolishing the Fed requires Congressional repeal of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which has no legislative support and is legally impossible for a president to do unilaterally.
Analysis
The probability that Donald Trump will end the Federal Reserve before January 20, 2029 is effectively zero due to fundamental legal and structural barriers. The Federal Reserve was created by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, a federal statute that can only be repealed by Congress through legislation passed by both the House and Senate and signed into law. A president has no unilateral authority to abolish the central bank, regardless of political pressure or public criticism regarding interest rates. While Trump has frequently attacked Fed policy and demanded lower interest rates, there is no evidence he has advocated for the institution's elimination, and no credible legislative effort to abolish the Fed exists in Congress.
Current Fed leadership under Chair Kevin Warsh is actively defending the bank's independence against political interference, explicitly stating in July 2026 congressional testimony that he will resist any external pressure to compromise the Central Bank's autonomy. Institutional stability remains intact with confirmed board members like Michelle Bowman holding terms through 2029, and the Fed continues operational functions including rate adjustments and new task forces on AI and communication. The conflict between Trump and the Fed is strictly limited to monetary policy disagreements, not structural abolition.
The current market price of 5% for 'Yes' appears slightly inflated relative to the near-certain impossibility of the event. While markets sometimes assign non-zero probabilities to extreme political scenarios, the legal requirements for abolishing the Fed make this outcome virtually impossible without Congressional action that has zero traction. The 1% probability I assign reflects the theoretical possibility of an unprecedented constitutional crisis or legislative miracle, but the overwhelming weight of evidence points to the Fed continuing unchanged through Trump's term.
Arguments
For
- Theoretical possibility of unprecedented constitutional crisis or legislative miracle
- Trump has shown willingness to challenge established institutions when politically motivated
Against
- President cannot unilaterally abolish the Federal Reserve without Congressional action
- No credible legislative effort to repeal the Federal Reserve Act exists
- Fed leadership is actively defending independence against political pressure
- Trump's conflict with Fed is limited to interest rate policy, not structural abolition
- Institutional stability confirmed with board members holding terms through 2029
Key drivers
- Legal requirement for Congressional repeal of Federal Reserve Act of 1913
- No legislative effort to abolish the Fed exists in Congress
- Fed Chair Kevin Warsh actively defending institutional independence
- Trump's criticism focused on interest rates rather than abolition
Risk factors
- Unprecedented constitutional crisis altering presidential removal powers
- Sudden bipartisan Congressional coalition to repeal the Federal Reserve Act
- Extreme political scenario where Trump refuses to recognize Fed authority
- Market mispricing due to overestimation of Trump's unilateral powers
Scenarios
Best case
Trump continues pressuring Fed for lower interest rates but accepts institutional independence, with Fed maintaining current operations through 2029.
Most likely
Trump and Fed continue their policy disagreements over interest rates while the Federal Reserve maintains full operational independence and institutional stability through the end of Trump's term.
Worst case
Congress passes and enacts legislation repealing the Federal Reserve Act, completely abolishing the Federal Reserve System before January 20, 2029.
More from this day
- politicsPolymarketEnded
US announces end of Iranian blockade by...?
AI95%MKT6%Edge+89Hidden GemThe market should resolve to Yes because Vice President JD Vance and CENTCOM officially announced the lifting of the US naval blockade on Iran on July 18, 2026, which falls before the July 24 deadline.
- economyPolymarketEnded
Core CPI YoY - July 2026
AI95%MKT15%Edge+80Hidden GemThe market will resolve to No because the actual Core CPI YoY for the period ending July 2026 (released as June 2026 data) is confirmed at 2.6%, which exceeds the 2.2% threshold.
- PoliticsKalshi1y
2026: Trump's bad year?
AI78%MKT11%Edge+67Hidden GemThe bear case for Trump is actively materializing in 2026 through major Supreme Court defeats on tariffs, scathing judicial rebukes of his litigation tactics, and legally contested massive monument rollbacks, making the 'Yes' outcome highly probable despite the market's 9% pricing.