Who will be Trump's next Press Secretary?
Anna Kelly looks like a live contender because an internal promotion is the most natural path if the role turns over. I make her a bit more likely than the market does, but not a dominant favorite because Trump-world personnel choices can still swing toward a more visible television or political surrogate.
Analysis
The strongest case for Anna Kelly is institutional proximity. In this kind of appointment, the White House often prefers someone already in the communications chain, with the president’s trust, familiarity with the press operation, and the ability to step in quickly without a long acclimation period. If the next press secretary is chosen from inside the current team, Kelly’s profile fits that pathway well, which makes her a credible front-runner rather than a speculative long shot.
The main competition comes from candidates who better fit Trump’s usual taste for loud, media-native, and highly loyal communicators. Scott Jennings offers television fluency and political combat skills, Maria Bartiromo brings national-name recognition, and Katie Miller may have the kind of loyalty and operational closeness that can matter a great deal in Trump staffing decisions. Alina Habba is also a plausible outside-the-box choice because she has already been used as a public defender and messenger, even if her legal portfolio makes the press secretary job a less natural fit.
My independent view is that the market slightly overstates Kelly’s edge but not by much. Her 27% implied probability is reasonable, yet I think the combination of incumbency and internal continuity nudges her closer to 30% than the current price suggests. The bigger market question is not whether Kelly is plausible, but whether Trump decides to bypass the conventional communications ladder entirely for a more charismatic, TV-ready figure; that keeps the race competitive and caps her probability below a true majority favorite.
Against the market, this looks only mildly mispriced. The yes side deserves a small premium because internal promotion is often the cleanest operational choice, but there are enough viable alternatives that Kelly should not be treated as a near-lock.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: Kelly is a natural continuity pick if the administration wants a smooth, low-friction transition in the press office.
- Arguments for Yes: She likely already has the trust and day-to-day experience needed to step into the role quickly.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: Trump has a history of favoring higher-profile or more performative communicators over traditional staff promotions.
- Arguments against Yes: Several alternatives, especially Katie Miller and Alina Habba, may better match the loyalty-first logic of the appointment.
Key drivers
- Anna Kelly’s proximity to the existing White House communications apparatus increases the odds of an internal promotion.
- Trump’s staffing style can favor loyalty and familiarity over conventional resume fit, which helps candidates already inside the circle.
Risk factors
- Trump may prefer a more famous or combative on-air personality over a career staffer.
- A change in current White House communications roles could open the door to a different insider with stronger political or media branding.
Scenarios
Best case
A turnover in the press office leads to an internal promotion, and Kelly is selected as the most trusted and operationally ready choice.
Most likely
Kelly remains a serious contender but faces a very live field of alternatives, making her one of several plausible choices rather than a clear lock.
Worst case
Trump bypasses the communications staff and appoints a better-known media figure or a different loyalist with a stronger public profile.
Outcomes
| Outcome | AI | MKT |
|---|---|---|
| Anna Kelly | 30% | 27% |
| Scott Jennings | 15% | 20% |
| Maria Bartiromo | 5% | 17% |
| Alina Habba | 20% | 6% |
| Katie Miller | 30% | 4% |
More from this day
- CompaniesKalshi1y
Starbucks total global stores in 2026
AI66%MKT11%Edge+55Hidden GemI think Starbucks is materially more likely than not to report more than 41,800 global stores in 2026. The market appears to be pricing in a slowdown that is possible, but the threshold is low enough relative to Starbucks’ historical footprint growth that Yes should be favored.
- PoliticsKalshi2y
Which agencies will Trump eliminate?
AI78%MKT26%Edge+52Hidden GemI think Yes is substantially more likely than the market implies, because multiple reports indicate USAID has already been dismantled in practice. The main uncertainty is whether the market resolves on formal legal abolition or on operational elimination, but the balance of evidence still favors Yes.
- PoliticsKalshi2y
Who will Trump pardon?
AI12%MKT50%Edge-38HypedMy independent estimate is that Barron Trump is unlikely to receive a presidential pardon by Jan. 21, 2029. A pardon would require either an actual prosecutorial risk or an extraordinary political/ family circumstance, both of which look uncommon for someone with no public indication of legal jeopardy.