Who will be Trump's next Press Secretary?
Anna Kelly looks like the strongest internal succession candidate, but the job is still more likely to stay with someone else or remain unchanged through 2029. I put her at 31%, modestly above the market’s 26%.
Analysis
Anna Kelly is a credible next-in-line type of candidate because White House press secretary appointments usually reward loyalty, proximity to the existing press operation, and the ability to step in quickly if the incumbent exits. In a Trump environment, those qualities matter more than celebrity, which gives an insider like Kelly a real pathway if there is a vacancy before 2029.
Compared with the other named contenders, Kelly has a cleaner institutional fit than Scott Jennings, who is more valuable as a media surrogate than as a daily White House operator, and a more natural communications profile than Alina Habba, whose brand is broader and more legal-politically oriented. Liz Huston and Natalie Harp can matter in a reshuffle, but they read as secondary options unless the White House decides to make a very specific loyalty-based pick.
The market at 26% looks slightly low but not dramatically wrong. The biggest reason to be cautious on Yes is that this is a timing-dependent bet: if the current press secretary stays through most of the term, Kelly never gets the promotion, and if a vacancy opens, Trump could still choose a different loyalist with a bigger public profile.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: Kelly is the most plausible insider promotion if the White House wants continuity in the press shop.
- Arguments for Yes: Her profile fits the sort of low-drama, high-trust appointment that often follows an abrupt personnel change.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: The office may not turn over at all before 2029, which would strand Kelly regardless of her standing.
- Arguments against Yes: Scott Jennings and Alina Habba have stronger public identities and could be favored if Trump wants a louder, more recognizable face.
Key drivers
- Kelly appears to be the kind of internal communications hire who would benefit most from a sudden vacancy.
- Trump typically values loyalty and message discipline over conventional résumé prestige for this role.
- The outcome depends heavily on whether a press secretary change actually happens before January 2029.
Risk factors
- The incumbent could simply keep the job long enough that no succession opportunity arises.
- Trump could prefer a higher-profile media personality or a more visibly combative loyalist if he wants a reset.
Scenarios
Best case
A vacancy opens, Kelly is seen as the trusted internal successor, and she is elevated to press secretary without a major external search.
Most likely
The current press operation remains stable for a while, and if a change occurs Kelly is a serious contender but not the default favorite to win it.
Worst case
The incumbent stays in place or Trump chooses an outside-facing loyalist such as Jennings or Habba, leaving Kelly out of the succession path.
Outcomes
| Outcome | AI | MKT |
|---|---|---|
| Anna Kelly | 31% | 26% |
| Scott Jennings | 23% | 19% |
| Alina Habba | 19% | 14% |
| Liz Huston | 15% | 4% |
| Natalie Harp | 12% | 4% |
More from this day
- economyPolymarket3mo
Will Stripe acquire any part of Paypal in 2026?
AI7%MKT67%Edge-60HypedI think a Stripe acquisition of any part of PayPal in 2026 is very unlikely, despite the market pricing it as a strong possibility. The main reason is that this would be a large, strategically odd, and likely antitrust-sensitive transaction with little visible evidence supporting it.
- FinancialsKalshi13y
Will OpenAI or Anthropic IPO first?
AI38%MKT93%Edge-55HypedI think OpenAI is substantially less likely than the market implies to IPO before Anthropic. The stronger read from the current evidence is that Anthropic has a modest but real timing edge, so I price the Yes outcome well below the market.
- pop culturePolymarketEnded
"Spider-Man: Brand New Day" 3rd Weekend Box Office (Lower Strikes)
AI64%MKT10%Edge+54Hidden GemA third weekend above 66 million is a very high bar, even for Spider-Man, so I lean toward Yes. The main reason to doubt that view is that this franchise can occasionally hold far better than a normal blockbuster if audience demand stays unusually strong.