Who will be the next Supreme Court justice?
James Ho is a plausible but not leading Supreme Court pick, and I rate his outright chance below the market because there is no evidence of an active nomination path. He remains in the conversation, but stronger political connections appear to belong to other conservative contenders.
Analysis
The decisive issue is whether a Supreme Court vacancy even opens before January 2029. That is a meaningful possibility, but still far from assured, and any Republican administration would almost certainly look first to the conservative appellate bench rather than to an outside political figure.
James Ho is a credible Supreme Court-type résumé: young enough, ideologically reliable, and already visible in conservative legal circles. The problem for his candidacy is that he does not appear to have the strongest political pipeline; Andrew Oldham and D. John Sauer look better positioned on personal ties and White House relevance, while Steven Menashi and Aileen Cannon are each more idiosyncratic bets.
The current market’s 18% price for Ho looks a little high given the absence of any real nomination signal. I still give him a real path to the seat if the right vacancy and political alignment emerge, but on balance I would shade him below market because the field contains several better-connected alternatives and no evidence yet suggests Ho is the clear internal favorite.
Arguments
For
- Ho has a strong conservative judicial profile that fits how Republican presidents typically justify Court picks.
- His relative youth would let a nominating president secure a long-term appointment.
Against
- He currently looks more like a respected possibility than a front-runner.
- Confirmation dynamics may favor candidates with clearer personal or administrative ties to the president.
Key drivers
- A Supreme Court vacancy before January 2029 is the prerequisite that would make any of these odds actionable.
- Ho’s age and appellate pedigree keep him inside the natural pool of durable, high-profile conservative nominees.
Risk factors
- The available reporting shows no active vetting, shortlist, or White House signal pointing to Ho.
- A better-connected contender could quickly pass him if the administration prioritizes political trust over pure jurisprudential fit.
Scenarios
Best case
A vacancy opens under a Republican administration, Ho becomes the consensus originalist option, and he is nominated and confirmed before January 2029.
Most likely
A vacancy may open, but Ho remains one of several plausible names and is edged out by a contender with stronger political backing.
Worst case
No vacancy occurs, or the White House chooses another conservative judge such as Sauer or Oldham instead.
Outcomes
| Outcome | AI | MKT |
|---|---|---|
| James Ho | 20% | 18% |
| Andrew Oldham | 28% | 16% |
| Aileen Cannon | 8% | 10% |
| D. John Sauer | 30% | 9% |
| Steven Menashi | 14% | 8% |
More from this day
- techPolymarketEnded
Grok 4.6 released by...?
AI82%MKT2%Edge+80Hidden GemGrok 4.6 looks likely to be released by the deadline, with the strongest signals pointing to an August 7 launch or public availability. The market price appears far too low relative to the reported timeline, though a small risk remains that the release slips or is not broadly accessible enough to qualify.
- PoliticsKalshi1y
2026: Trump's bad year?
AI71%MKT10%Edge+61Hidden GemI think there is a strong chance 2026 becomes a recognizable bear-case year for Trump because multiple legal and institutional fights are already lined up to produce visible setbacks. The market’s single-digit yes price looks too low given how many independent downside catalysts are active.
- FinancialsKalshi13y
Will OpenAI or Anthropic IPO first?
AI34%MKT84%Edge-50HypedI put OpenAI first at about 34%, with Anthropic more likely to reach the public market first given the faster reported timeline and earlier filing reports. The current market price looks too confident in OpenAI's lead relative to the timeline risk.