July Inflation US - Annual
July CPI has a plausible path into the low 3s, but getting all the way to 3.1% or below still looks like a stretch from a June reading of 3.5%. No remains the likelier outcome, though Yes is more plausible than the current market price suggests.
Analysis
The latest official reading before this report showed CPI at 3.5% year over year in June, which is still clearly above the 3.1% cutoff. To resolve Yes, July has to deliver a meaningful additional step down, not just a modest cooling, and that is a fairly demanding move because one month of data has to overcome both the current level and whatever happened in July of last year.
There are real arguments in favor of a lower July print. The recent trend has been favorable on the margin, with June helped by energy weakness and the most recent nowcast pointing to a small monthly increase in headline inflation and core inflation around the mid-2% area. If gasoline and other energy components stay soft, and if shelter and other sticky services categories continue to ease, the annual rate could drop faster than many expect because the comparison base from last July is no longer especially easy but could still be helpful.
Even so, the balance of evidence still leans against Yes. The June drop was large, and large monthly declines in headline CPI are often hard to repeat, especially when the nowcast only suggests a small increase rather than a negative one. A result of 3.2% or 3.3% looks more natural than 3.1% or below unless there is another clear energy surprise or broad-based softness across services and goods. That is why the market is pricing the threshold as a low-probability outcome, and while I think that is somewhat aggressive, it is directionally sensible.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: A favorable base effect from last July combined with a soft August-style monthly print could push the annual rate to 3.1% or lower.
- Arguments for Yes: Recent cooling in core inflation and energy-led disinflation show that headline CPI can still fall quickly when volatile components cooperate.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: The starting point is still 3.5%, so the report needs an unusually strong downward move to clear 3.1%.
- Arguments against Yes: The latest nowcast points to only a small monthly headline increase, which is usually not enough to bring year-over-year inflation down by four-tenths.
Key drivers
- The June 3.5% year-over-year reading leaves a sizable gap to close in just one report.
- Soft energy prices and a low monthly headline increase could pull the annual rate down faster than expected.
Risk factors
- A rebound in gasoline or other volatile components would keep headline inflation above the cutoff.
- Sticky shelter and services inflation could prevent the annual rate from dropping enough even if core cools.
Scenarios
Best case
Energy prices stay weak, core categories ease further, and the July year-over-year CPI drops into the high 2s or very low 3s, making Yes a clear winner.
Most likely
Inflation cools modestly from June but not enough to break 3.1%, with the final print landing somewhere around the low-to-mid 3% range.
Worst case
Gasoline or services rebound enough that the annual rate stays near 3.3% to 3.5%, leaving the market comfortably in No territory.
More from this day
- economyPolymarketEnded
USD x Iranian rials End of August?
AI88%MKT11%Edge+77Hidden GemThe supplied Bonbast-style free-market readings point to USD being below 1.7M IRR, so Yes looks substantially more likely than the current market price implies. The main caveat is unit and series confusion, not the underlying direction of the rate.
- PoliticsKalshi1y
2026: Trump's bad year?
AI71%MKT10%Edge+61Hidden GemI think there is a strong chance 2026 becomes a recognizable bear-case year for Trump because multiple legal and institutional fights are already lined up to produce visible setbacks. The market’s single-digit yes price looks too low given how many independent downside catalysts are active.
- sportsPolymarketEnded
Jagiellonia Białystok vs. Rangers FC
AI37%MKT97%Edge-60HypedJagiellonia do have a real home-win path, but the broader pricing and matchup signals point to a much closer contest than the market implies. My estimate is that Jagiellonia win in regulation about 37% of the time, with Rangers or a draw more likely than the current market price suggests.