How many Fed rate cuts in 2026?
The no-cut outcome looks more likely than not, because the Fed has already stayed on hold through midyear and recent messaging still centers on inflation risk rather than recession risk. Even so, there is meaningful late-year downside if growth weakens or inflation cools enough to justify one 25 bp cut.
Analysis
The strongest fact in favor of no cuts is the Fed’s current posture: as of early August 2026, it has already held rates steady through five consecutive meetings, with the July decision leaving the target range unchanged at 3.50% to 3.75%. That pattern matters because it shows the committee does not currently see an urgent need to ease, and the recent dissenting votes reportedly leaned more hawkish than dovish, which is not the setup you would expect if cuts were close.
From a macro perspective, the no-cut case is still anchored by the same forces that kept the Fed patient in the first half of the year. Inflation has not clearly returned to a level that would make the committee comfortable delivering cuts, economic activity has remained solid enough to avoid panic easing, and unemployment has not deteriorated enough to force a support response. With only September, October, and December left on the schedule, the Fed would need a clear shift in the data to move from a prolonged hold to an easing cycle.
The main argument against a no-cut outcome is that the Fed still has enough time to react if the data turns. A softening labor market, a visible decline in core inflation, or a growth scare later in the year could easily justify one quarter-point cut by December. That is why this market is not a lock, especially because the final meeting of the year is still far away and policy expectations can change quickly if incoming reports weaken. Even so, the balance of evidence says the hurdle for a cut is still higher than the hurdle for another pause.
Market pricing also supports the no-cut side, though I would not take the current implied confidence at face value as certainty. Traders have been leaning hard toward no cuts because the Fed’s recent communication has been consistently cautious, and some commentary even leaves open the possibility that the next move could still be a hike rather than a cut if inflation reaccelerates. On balance, I think the market is directionally right: no cuts is the most likely single outcome, but the remaining meetings preserve enough optionality that the probability should stay below the high 80s rather than be treated as virtually guaranteed.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: The Fed has shown repeated willingness to stay on hold, which is the default posture needed for a no-cut year.
- Arguments for Yes: Inflation and policy rhetoric still appear to be the dominant concerns, making near-term easing unlikely.
- Arguments for Yes: Stable unemployment and resilient activity reduce the urgency for the Fed to provide support through rate cuts.
- Arguments for Yes: A cut would require a notable deterioration in the data, and there is currently no strong sign that such a deterioration is underway.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: There are still three FOMC meetings left, leaving plenty of time for the Fed to respond to weakening conditions.
- Arguments against Yes: If inflation eases meaningfully or the labor market softens, even a single 25 bp cut would break the no-cut outcome.
- Arguments against Yes: The Fed’s projections and public commentary have not been perfectly consistent, which means the policy path is still uncertain.
- Arguments against Yes: An unexpected shock could override the current pause and lead to an emergency easing move.
Key drivers
- The Fed has already held rates steady for five straight meetings, which signals a strong bias toward patience.
- Recent committee behavior appears more concerned with inflation persistence than with recession risk.
- Only three scheduled meetings remain in 2026, so a cut now would require a clear and timely shift in the data.
- Current market pricing heavily favors no cuts, reinforcing the view that this is the consensus outcome.
Risk factors
- A late-year slowdown in growth or hiring could push the Fed toward one precautionary cut.
- Inflation may cool faster than expected, creating room for easing by the December meeting.
- A sharp financial or geopolitical shock could force an emergency cut outside the normal schedule.
- Market expectations can flip quickly if a few monthly data releases surprise on the weak side.
Scenarios
Best case
Inflation stays sticky, growth remains steady, and the labor market does not weaken enough to justify easing, allowing the Fed to keep rates unchanged through December and preserve the no-cut outcome.
Most likely
The Fed remains on hold through at least the next meeting or two, and the year-end decision hinges on incoming labor and inflation data, but the current balance still favors no cuts by December.
Worst case
The economy slows materially or inflation falls faster than expected, prompting one or more cuts in September, October, or December and causing the no-cut bet to fail.
More from this day
- CompaniesKalshi1y
Starbucks total global stores in 2026
AI89%MKT9%Edge+80Hidden GemStarbucks looks likely to finish 2026 above 41,800 stores. The company’s reported Q3 base of 41,304 and full-year guidance for 600 to 650 net new coffeehouses leave a meaningful cushion over the threshold.
- PoliticsKalshi1y
2026: Trump's bad year?
AI73%MKT11%Edge+62Hidden GemTrump looks materially more likely than not to have a genuinely adverse 2026, with legal exposure, court fights, and internal political resistance creating several paths to a bad year. The market’s 11% yes price looks far too low unless the event is defined very narrowly.
- FinancialsKalshi13y
Will OpenAI or Anthropic IPO first?
AI30%MKT82%Edge-52HypedI estimate OpenAI has only about a 30% chance of beating Anthropic to the IPO. Anthropic’s reported late-2026 target and OpenAI’s apparent drift toward 2027 make Anthropic the likelier first mover.