US real GDP growth in 2035?
My base case is that U.S. real GDP growth in 2035 lands in the high-1% range, with the 1.6% to 2.0% bucket the single most likely outcome and meaningful tail risk of a 2.1% to 2.5% print. I think the market is slightly too concentrated on the lower-growth outcomes and underweights the chance that productivity and cyclical normalization keep growth a bit above the CBO-style anchor.
Analysis
The best anchor in the provided material is the CBO-based long-run expectation that real GDP growth slows to about 1.8% through 2035. That is not a recessionary outlook, but it does imply a mature expansion with demographic drag, slower labor-force growth, and only modest productivity gains. Recent actual prints also fit that frame: 2026 has shown volatility, with one quarter at 2.1% annualized and the next at 1.5%, which is consistent with an economy that can oscillate around a sub-2% trend rather than settle into a sustained 3% regime.
On that basis, the most likely outcomes are concentrated around 1.6% to 2.0% and 2.1% to 2.5%, with the former slightly more likely because the official baseline sits near 1.8% and near-term forecasts remain around 1.9%. Still, the odds of slipping into 1.1% to 1.5% are not trivial because long-run trend growth can undershoot when fiscal drag, tighter financial conditions, or weaker labor supply compound. A 2.6% to 3.0% result is possible, but it requires a sustained upside surprise in productivity, investment, or immigration-driven labor-force growth that is not the central scenario in the sources provided.
Compared with the current market, I think the distribution is somewhat mispriced at the margin. The market appears to overweight the lowest growth buckets and underweight the center of mass around 1.6% to 2.5%, likely reflecting a broad macro-bearish bias. I would still keep the sub-2% band as the modal outcome, but not as overwhelmingly as the market implies; the more important correction is that a middling 2% handle is more plausible than the pricing suggests.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: The official long-run baseline available here is close to 1.8%, which supports a high probability for a sub-2.0% growth outcome.
- Arguments for Yes: Recent GDP prints and sticky-inflation forecasts are consistent with a slow-growth environment rather than a reacceleration above 2.5%.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: Medium-term private forecasts show room for growth to drift above 2% as the economy normalizes, especially if productivity surprises to the upside.
- Arguments against Yes: The market may be correctly anticipating that 2035 is far enough out for today’s cyclical slowdown to fade and be replaced by a more stable, if still modest, expansion.
Key drivers
- The CBO-style long-run baseline centers near 1.8%, making a mid-to-high 1% outcome the most defensible anchor.
- Recent quarterly GDP data and near-term private forecasts point to slow but positive growth rather than either stagnation or a return to 3% trend.
Risk factors
- An unexpected productivity boom or stronger labor-force growth could push the result into the 2.6% to 3.0% range.
- A prolonged period of weak investment, tighter policy, or supply-side damage could pull growth down into the 1.1% to 1.5% bucket or lower.
Scenarios
Best case
Productivity and labor supply improve enough that 2035 real GDP growth lands in the 2.1% to 2.5% range, with a nontrivial shot at 2.6% to 3.0% if the expansion is unusually strong.
Most likely
Growth settles near the CBO-style baseline, making 1.6% to 2.0% the most likely bucket, with 2.1% to 2.5% the main challenger.
Worst case
Trend growth continues to erode and 2035 comes in at 1.1% to 1.5%, with downside pressure from weak labor-force growth and soft capital deepening.
Outcomes
| Outcome | AI | MKT |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1% to 2.5% | 28% | 10% |
| 1.6% to 2.0% | 40% | 9% |
| 2.6% to 3.0% | 12% | 9% |
| 3.1% to 3.5% | 5% | 8% |
| 1.1% to 1.5% | 15% | 7% |
More from this day
- CompaniesKalshi1y
Starbucks total global stores in 2026
AI83%MKT9%Edge+74Hidden GemStarbucks looks materially more likely than not to finish 2026 above 41,800 global stores. The company’s own Q3 count and FY2026 store-growth guidance both point to a comfortable cushion above the threshold.
- politicsPolymarket3mo
Will the U.S. invade Iran before 2027?
AI78%MKT26%Edge+52Hidden GemThe evidence strongly suggests the United States has already carried out direct military action against Iran in 2026, so the market is leaning toward Yes if the resolution standard is broad. The main reason this is not near-certain is that the contract language is narrower than ordinary usage and may require a true territorial-control invasion rather than airstrikes alone.
- pop culturePolymarketEnded
"The Odyssey" 3rd Weekend Box Office
AI57%MKT6%Edge+51Hidden GemRecent tracking has the film around 45 million for the third weekend, which would clear the under-47 million threshold if it holds. The market is heavily priced toward No, but the public estimates leave Yes meaningfully live.