Will Section IV of the 25th Amendment be used during Trump's Presidency?
Section IV of the 25th Amendment is possible but still unlikely during Trump’s remaining term. I estimate the chance of an actual invocation at about 8%, well below the market-implied 30%.
Analysis
My baseline view is that Section IV is a very high-threshold constitutional mechanism that only happens when there is both a genuine incapacity and a coordinated decision by the vice president and a majority of the Cabinet. Trump’s remaining term is long enough for some nontrivial health or incapacity risk, especially given age, but the event still requires an extraordinary convergence of facts rather than ordinary political conflict or media controversy. In practical terms, that means the biggest obstacle is not only whether something goes wrong with Trump, but whether top Republican officials decide that invoking the most confrontational removal process in the Constitution is the least-bad option.
Historically, that coordination barrier is enormous. Section IV has never been used, and that matters because it suggests both a very high evidentiary bar and strong institutional reluctance to initiate a constitutional crisis unless incapacity is unmistakable. A mere decline in performance, erratic behavior, or intra-party frustration is not enough on its own; the mechanism is designed for a president who cannot discharge the duties of office, not simply one whom allies dislike or find politically toxic. The presence of a loyal vice president and cabinet further suppresses the odds, since invocation would require those officials to be willing to break with the president and absorb the fallout.
The current market price of 30% for Yes looks too high relative to those constraints. I can see why traders might price in Trump-specific volatility, age-related health uncertainty, and the possibility of an extreme medical or mental-health event, but 30% implies a level of expected institutional action that is hard to justify without concrete evidence of impending incapacity or elite defection. My estimate is materially lower because the event needs both a rare trigger and a politically costly coalition to act, and the provided context shows speculation rather than signs of actual invocation.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: Trump’s age and the length of the remaining term create a meaningful chance of a serious incapacity event that could trigger constitutional action.
- Arguments for Yes: If a dramatic medical or cognitive crisis becomes undeniable, the vice president and Cabinet may judge Section IV as the only workable remedy.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: Section IV requires elite coordination, and a loyal vice president plus Cabinet makes formal invocation highly unlikely absent overwhelming evidence.
- Arguments against Yes: The amendment has never been invoked, and routine political turbulence is far short of the standard needed to use it.
Key drivers
- Trump’s age and the nonzero chance of a serious medical or functional incapacity before the term ends.
- The constitutional requirement for the vice president and a majority of the Cabinet to agree, which makes invocation politically difficult even if problems emerge.
- The remaining time in the term is long enough for a low-probability event to occur, but not long enough to erase the institutional resistance.
Risk factors
- A sudden, clearly incapacitating health crisis could force officials to use the mechanism despite political loyalty.
- A major break between Trump and the vice president or Cabinet could make coordination more plausible than historical precedent suggests.
Scenarios
Best case
Trump suffers a severe, unmistakable incapacity and top officials rapidly agree to invoke Section IV, making the mechanism active before the end of the term.
Most likely
Trump experiences normal political and health volatility, but not the kind of clear incapacity and elite consensus needed to trigger Section IV.
Worst case
No disabling event occurs, or any crisis is managed politically or medically without a formal 25th Amendment invocation.
More from this day
- CompaniesKalshi1y
Starbucks total global stores in 2026
AI83%MKT9%Edge+74Hidden GemStarbucks looks materially more likely than not to finish 2026 above 41,800 global stores. The company’s own Q3 count and FY2026 store-growth guidance both point to a comfortable cushion above the threshold.
- politicsPolymarket3mo
Will the U.S. invade Iran before 2027?
AI78%MKT26%Edge+52Hidden GemThe evidence strongly suggests the United States has already carried out direct military action against Iran in 2026, so the market is leaning toward Yes if the resolution standard is broad. The main reason this is not near-certain is that the contract language is narrower than ordinary usage and may require a true territorial-control invasion rather than airstrikes alone.
- pop culturePolymarketEnded
"The Odyssey" 3rd Weekend Box Office
AI57%MKT6%Edge+51Hidden GemRecent tracking has the film around 45 million for the third weekend, which would clear the under-47 million threshold if it holds. The market is heavily priced toward No, but the public estimates leave Yes meaningfully live.