MLB: Highest ABS Challenge Success Rate (Team)
Arizona is a live contender because its ABS success rate is already strong, but it is not the current leader and its low challenge volume makes it hard to finish first. I think the Diamondbacks have a meaningful but clearly sub-50% chance, around 28%, to end the season with the top team rate.
Analysis
The Diamondbacks are in the mix, but they are not the team to beat right now. As of the latest update they sit third at 60.5% success, and that matters because the market is not asking whether they are good in this category, only whether they finish with the best final rate. Being third in mid-July is a respectable position, but it also means Arizona needs at least two teams above them to fade or stall while the Diamondbacks hold their edge through the rest of the regular season.
The strongest argument for Arizona is that the current gap does not sound enormous, and ABS challenge success rates are still subject to meaningful noise over a relatively modest sample. With only 152 challenges issued, the Diamondbacks’ rate can move noticeably with a run of favorable or unfavorable decisions. If they continue challenging selectively and keep winning at roughly the same pace, they can still climb if one or two current leaders regress toward the league average. The league environment also helps a bit, since catchers have generally performed better than hitters and pitchers in this system, which supports the idea that the better-prepared teams can sustain high rates.
The biggest arguments against Arizona are volume and competition. The tie-break rule favors the team with more challenge wins if percentages tie, and Arizona’s low volume means it is disadvantaged in that scenario. A team with more challenges can defend its percentage lead with more raw wins, while Arizona needs not only a strong conversion rate but also enough opportunities to separate itself. Since the news summary indicates there are already at least two teams ahead of them, the Diamondbacks must outperform multiple contenders over the remaining months, which makes this more of a plausible upset than the most likely result. That is why the market’s no side deserves the edge, even though Arizona remains a legitimate threat if the standings stay compressed.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: The Diamondbacks are already within striking distance of the lead, so a small improvement or a slight dip from rivals could be enough.
- Arguments for Yes: Their low sample size means the current 60.5% figure can still move materially if they continue to receive a moderate number of challenges.
- Arguments for Yes: A well-run team that challenges selectively can preserve a high success rate better than teams with noisier challenge profiles.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: Arizona is not currently first, so they must pass multiple teams instead of simply defending an existing lead.
- Arguments against Yes: Their low volume hurts them in tie-breaks and reduces the chance that they can build a decisive raw-win advantage.
- Arguments against Yes: Other top teams may have stronger challenge infrastructure or more favorable personnel, making it difficult for Arizona to remain ahead through October.
Key drivers
- Arizona is already near the top with a 60.5% success rate, so only a modest late-season swing could put them first.
- The Diamondbacks have relatively few challenges, which makes their percentage more volatile than a higher-volume competitor's rate.
- The final ranking depends on both winning percentage and raw challenge wins, so low-volume teams can lose tie scenarios.
- If current leaders regress while Arizona stays efficient, the Diamondbacks can move into first without needing a dramatic turnaround.
Risk factors
- Another team with a similar or slightly better percentage can hold the lead simply by accumulating more challenge wins.
- Arizona's low challenge count leaves them vulnerable to tie-break losses if they end up level on percentage with a rival.
- The team is already behind at least two clubs, so they need several things to break their way over a long remaining season.
- If Arizona's success rate cools even slightly, their path to finishing first becomes much harder because the bar is already above 60%.
Scenarios
Best case
Arizona keeps winning a high share of challenges, the current leaders lose efficiency, and the Diamondbacks finish with the top percentage while also avoiding a tie-break loss on raw wins.
Most likely
The Diamondbacks remain one of the better ABS challenge teams but do not quite overtake the field, with another club finishing the season with the best overall success rate.
Worst case
One or more current leaders maintain a similar or better success rate, Arizona regresses slightly, and the Diamondbacks finish second or third rather than first.
More from this day
- PoliticsKalshi1y
2026: Trump's dream year?
AI72%MKT5%Edge+67Hidden GemGiven that the three policy pillars of the bull case (tax cuts/deregulation, likely Fed rate cuts, and a weakening of regulatory restraints via the Supreme Court) are already in place, the outcome now primarily hinges on the 2026 midterms and a small residual macro/geo risk; I assess a substantially higher chance of the bull case occurring than the market does.
- PoliticsKalshi2y
Which agencies will Trump eliminate?
AI98%MKT36%Edge+62Hidden GemBased on clear executive actions, formal notifications, mass staff removals, and program cancellations in 2025, I assess with very high confidence that USAID was eliminated as an independent agency during Trump's term.
- PoliticsKalshi1y
2026: Trump's bad year?
AI62%MKT7%Edge+55Hidden GemI assess a better-than-even chance that a credible "bear case" for Trump will materialize in 2026 — a year of cumulative legal, financial, and policy setbacks that meaningfully weaken his political position.