Elon Musk # tweets July 11 - July 13, 2026?
I think the market is mispriced on the low side: Elon Musk is more likely than not to stay under 40 counted posts in this 48-hour window, and I would put the Yes chance in the mid-80s.
Analysis
The best recent read on Musk’s posting pace points to a relatively manageable volume entering the market window. One official XTracker snapshot shows his current July 7-14 tracking period at 5 total posts, while another XTracker snapshot shows 21 posts in the June 30-July 7 period; even allowing for snapshot timing quirks, those figures imply a pace far below the more than 20 posts per day needed to get above 40 in a two-day window. A separate seven-day count site reported 104 posts from July 2-9, which still works out to roughly 15 posts per day and leaves meaningful room under the 40-post cutoff.
The news backdrop is active enough to create bursts, so the risk of a sudden spike is real. On July 1, Musk denied a Reuters-reported Wall Street Journal story about SpaceX, the Guardian documented a heavy stretch of UK race-and-immigration posting on July 4, and CNBC’s planned interview with him was canceled on July 10 as SpaceX weakened. That mix of business, politics, and media controversy is exactly the sort of environment where Musk can abruptly accelerate his posting rate.
Even so, the threshold is high enough that I still favor Yes decisively. To lose the under-40 bet, Musk would need to sustain an unusually intense posting burst across both days, not just a single noisy thread, and the recent observed pace does not suggest that kind of sustained frenzy. The market’s 23.5% Yes price looks too low relative to the recent tracker evidence, so my independent estimate is that under 40 is the more likely outcome by a wide margin.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: The official tracker snapshots suggest Musk’s recent posting pace is nowhere near the 20-plus posts per day needed to exceed 40 in 48 hours.
- Arguments for Yes: Even the higher third-party seven-day count still implies an average around 15 posts per day, which leaves a comfortable buffer under the cutoff.
- Arguments for Yes: The market window starts at midday ET, which reduces the chance that a morning burst alone can push the total past 40.
- Arguments for Yes: Recent evidence shows activity is present but not explosive, which is usually enough for an under-40 result in a two-day window.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: Musk can still enter a rapid posting cycle when a fresh controversy lands, and that can overwhelm a quiet baseline.
- Arguments against Yes: The recent news flow around SpaceX and Musk is busy enough to produce a sudden tweet storm rather than a normal day.
- Arguments against Yes: If he starts reposting or quote-posting heavily, the count can rise much faster than a simple text-post average suggests.
- Arguments against Yes: The market is correctly warning that Musk’s output is bursty, so a single intense 24-hour stretch could still flip the result.
Key drivers
- Recent tracker data indicates a posting pace materially below the level needed to miss the under-40 threshold.
- The event only needs Musk to avoid a sustained high-volume burst across two days, which is a lower bar than a weekly count market.
- News around SpaceX, the CNBC no-show, and political posting gives him plenty of potential triggers for a short-term spike.
- Market pricing appears to assume burstiness is more dangerous than the recent observed counts suggest.
Risk factors
- A sudden high-visibility Musk thread on SpaceX, X, or politics could generate enough reposts and quote posts to break the 40-post line.
- If he spends July 11 or July 12 in a reactive mode, the count could accelerate much faster than recent averages imply.
- The tracker data is a snapshot, so a short-lived burst that happens after the crawl could be missed in some third-party summaries.
- Musk’s posting behavior is famously erratic, which makes any simple average less reliable than it would be for a normal account.
Scenarios
Best case
Musk stays relatively quiet for most of the window, posts only a modest handful of times, and the final count lands well below 40, closer to the low-teens or 20s.
Most likely
He posts at a moderate pace that is noisy but not extreme, ending somewhere in the 20-to-35 range and comfortably satisfying the under-40 condition.
Worst case
A fresh business or political controversy triggers an extended posting burst, and the count races past 40 well before the window closes.
More from this day
- PoliticsKalshi3mo
Will a cabinet member be impeached?
AI97%MKT5%Edge+92Hidden Gem**Very likely Yes.** A sitting Cabinet member (Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte) is already being tried in the Senate impeachment court, which in the Philippines follows a House impeachment — so the factual threshold for “impeached” has effectively been met and the probability of at least one Cabinet member being impeached before 2027 is extremely high.
- techPolymarketEnded
Best AI model on July 18?
AI13%MKT97%Edge-84HypedI think claude-opus-4-6-thinking is a clear underdog here. It is currently near the top of the leaderboard, but it is not the leader today, and the latest frontier releases make it more likely to stay around second or third than to reclaim first.
- CompaniesKalshi1y
Robinhood funded customers in 2026
AI12%MKT81%Edge-69HypedBased on reported mid-2026 metrics and required growth rates, I assess a low probability that Robinhood will report above 30.2M funded customers in 2026 — roughly a 12% chance.