Who will be Trump's next Attorney General?
I assess a ~45% chance Todd Blanche becomes Trump's permanent Attorney General — he has the strongest structural advantages (acting status, DOJ background, expedience for confirmation) but faces meaningful political competition from Lee Zeldin and strategic incentives for Trump to pick a higher-profile political ally.
Analysis
**Stage 1 — Blind analysis (ignore current market prices):**
- Context summary: Todd Blanche is the acting Attorney General since April 2, 2026. No permanent appointment had been announced as of early July 2026. Multiple named candidates (Lee Zeldin, Ron DeSantis, Andrew Bailey, Ken Paxton, others) have been floated publicly. Trump’s selection calculus will weigh loyalty, confirmation risk, political optics, and the utility of the AG role for campaign/priorities.
- Reasons pushing toward Blanche (independent view): acting incumbency carries big practical advantages. Blanche already runs the Department, has institutional knowledge, and can immediately continue Trump-aligned priorities. Confirmation risk is generally lower for a mainstream career prosecutor who has occupied senior DOJ roles. Quick confirmation minimizes political disruption and avoids a protracted selection fight before midterm/primary season.
- Reasons pulling away from Blanche: Trump frequently rewards political allies or uses appointments for messaging. A politically prominent pick (e.g., Zeldin) can energize the base and be positioned as a partisan weapon; conversely, selecting a rival (DeSantis) is unlikely. Trump may prefer a figure who is overtly political rather than a careerist, especially if he wants an AG who will aggressively pursue certain investigations in a highly publicized manner. High-profile state AGs (Paxton, Bailey) and party-confident politicos also offer political advantages at the cost of larger confirmation fights or ethical baggage.
- My independent synthesis: balancing structural advantages (acting status, lower confirmation friction, continuity) against political incentives (rewarding or signaling with a high-profile political pick), I assign Todd Blanche a plurality but not a dominant probability. Lee Zeldin is the next most plausible pick because he offers political loyalty and messaging value without the extreme legal baggage of some other state AGs; DeSantis is a low-to-moderate probability given rivalry dynamics; Paxton and Bailey are plausible as loyalist, litigious picks but carry higher confirmation and reputational risk. My independent probabilities across the five named contenders are: Blanche 45%, Zeldin 25%, DeSantis 12%, Andrew Bailey 9%, Ken Paxton 9%.
**Stage 2 — Market calibration (after viewing current market prices):**
- Observed market state in this task: the provided multi-outcome market lists Todd Blanche at 75%, Lee Zeldin 5%, Ron DeSantis 4%, Andrew Bailey 1%, Ken Paxton 1% (and overall event liquidity ~9.4M contracts). This pricing places overwhelming weight on Blanche compared to my independent assessment.
- Why markets might be pricing Blanche at ~75% (possible rationales): - *Liquidity and anchoring:* heavy early liquidity behind the acting incumbent can create an anchoring effect, especially if retail traders follow headlines that emphasize his acting role. - *Platform differences and stale books:* some platforms (or an aggregated feed) may trail other markets that favor Zeldin, or one deep market drove aggregation; large single bets can overwhelm thinner markets and push the displayed probability higher than true consensus. - *Risk aversion/time preference:* traders may overweight the simplest outcome (keep acting AG) because it’s the path of least resistance; that behavioral preference inflates the acting incumbent’s price. - *Asymmetric information among traders:* insiders or better-informed participants who prefer Blanche may have pushed price; conversely, traders who favor Zeldin may be spread across other markets (Polymarket shows different leader), creating an apparent disparity.
- Why I think the market is mispriced relative to my independent view: 75% implies near-certainty and underestimates Trump’s political incentives to choose a higher-profile partisan pick and the nontrivial confirmation risks of certain candidates. Important countervailing signals (Polymarket and other books showing Zeldin strong, public statements, and the fact Trump has delayed a permanent appointment) argue against such a lopsided probability. Given the divergence, there appears to be actionable disagreement: if you can short Blanche at ~75% versus my ~45% fair probability, that would be a statistically favorable position assuming no new disqualifying information for other candidates.
- Practical implications for traders: the market overweights the default/continuity narrative. If you prefer to trade on my model, consider shorting Blanche and reallocating to Zeldin or a basket of other plausible candidates; however, monitor newsflow closely because announcements, endorsements, or leaked preferences from Trump can quickly and legitimately shift probabilities.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes — Acting-incumbent momentum: Blanche already leads DOJ operations and avoiding a transition is simpler and lower-risk for the administration.
- Arguments for Yes — Confirmability: as a DOJ insider/career prosecutor, Blanche presents fewer grounds for prolonged confirmation fights than high-profile partisan alternatives.
- Arguments for Yes — Administrative continuity: keeping Blanche signals stability and allows the administration to pursue legal priorities without internal disruption.
- Arguments for Yes — Low immediate political cost: selecting Blanche avoids elevating a rival and reduces media spectacle that can distract from other campaign objectives.
Against
- Arguments against Yes — Political utility: Trump may prefer a more overtly political pick (Zeldin or another political loyalist) to energize supporters and signal priorities, which lowers Blanche's ceiling.
- Arguments against Yes — Lack of marquee appeal: Blanche lacks the political profile to serve as a visible, combative public advocate, something Trump sometimes prefers in senior appointees.
- Arguments against Yes — Internal pressures: factional party actors and outside interest groups may lobby for a partisan, high-profile AG rather than a careerist acting official.
- Arguments against Yes — Confirmation wildcard: while generally lower-risk, Blanche could still encounter opposition over specific DOJ decisions he’s made as acting AG, leading Trump to pick someone less tethered to prior DOJ positions.
Key drivers
- Acting-incumbent advantage (continuity, institutional knowledge, lower initial friction for confirmation)
- Trump's political calculus (rewarding loyalty, base-messaging value, and management of intra-party rivals)
- Senate confirmation dynamics and appetite for contentious nominees
- Public optics and legal/ethical baggage of named candidates (which affects confirmation and political cost)
Risk factors
- Rapid change in Trump's tactical preferences (public endorsement or private decision favoring a political figure)
- Major negative revelations about a frontrunner (ethical/legal findings that derail confirmation)
- Shifts in Senate composition or key senator statements that raise confirmation risk for otherwise plausible candidates
- Market liquidity concentrated on a small platform causing temporary mispricing
Scenarios
Best case
Blanche is formally nominated and confirmed swiftly: continuity in DOJ actions, minimal Senate fight, quick consolidation of the role. This is the easiest path politically and administratively and would validate a high probability on the acting incumbent.
Most likely
A politically acceptable compromise: Trump selects a loyalist who balances political messaging with confirmability (either Blanche or a mid-profile state AG like Zeldin). Expect some jockeying and leaks, and a selection timeline that favors candidates who minimize Senate resistance while still satisfying Trump's desire for a partisan guardian of his legal interests.
Worst case
Trump announces a highly controversial pick (e.g., Paxton) that triggers intense hearings, negative headlines, and potential defeats or protracted confirmation negotiations; alternatively, Trump delays indefinitely, leaving the position in prolonged acting status and creating legal/political uncertainty.
Outcomes
| Outcome | AI | MKT |
|---|---|---|
| Todd Blanche | 45% | 75% |
| Lee Zeldin | 25% | 5% |
| Ron DeSantis | 12% | 4% |
| Andrew Bailey | 9% | 1% |
| Ken Paxton | 9% | 1% |
More from this day
- PoliticsKalshi3mo
Will a cabinet member be impeached?
AI97%MKT5%Edge+92Hidden Gem**Very likely Yes.** A sitting Cabinet member (Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte) is already being tried in the Senate impeachment court, which in the Philippines follows a House impeachment — so the factual threshold for “impeached” has effectively been met and the probability of at least one Cabinet member being impeached before 2027 is extremely high.
- techPolymarketEnded
Best AI model on July 18?
AI13%MKT97%Edge-84HypedI think claude-opus-4-6-thinking is a clear underdog here. It is currently near the top of the leaderboard, but it is not the leader today, and the latest frontier releases make it more likely to stay around second or third than to reclaim first.
- CompaniesKalshi1y
Robinhood funded customers in 2026
AI12%MKT81%Edge-69HypedBased on reported mid-2026 metrics and required growth rates, I assess a low probability that Robinhood will report above 30.2M funded customers in 2026 — roughly a 12% chance.