Who will be Trump's next Attorney General?
I assess Todd Blanche as the single most likely pick but substantially less certain than markets imply — I put a 50% chance Blanche is Trump's next Attorney General, with Lee Zeldin as the clearest alternative at ~30%.
Analysis
**Stage 1 — Blind analysis (ignore current market prices):**
- Context: Todd Blanche has been serving as acting Attorney General since April 2, 2026, after elevation from deputy AG under Pam Bondi. That institutional incumbency confers considerable advantages: day‑to‑day control of the Department of Justice, an established working relationship with career staff, and the optics of continuity. Historically, presidents often convert acting officials into permanent appointees when the acting AG is politically acceptable and avoids major controversy.
- Arguments that increase Blanche's raw probability: incumbency, administrative continuity, lower confirmation friction if the Senate majority is favorable or at least split (an acting AG who has been on the job without scandal is easier to confirm than a highly political outsider), and the preference by some presidents for trouble‑free appointments that avoid headline fights early in a term.
- Countervailing forces: Trump has a strong preference for nominees who signal loyalty and willingness to pursue his political priorities publicly. Blanche's background (elevated from Bondi’s team) suggests some alignment, but he is more of an institutional actor than a headline‑grabbing partisan warrior. High‑profile loyalists (Zeldin, Pirro, Paxton) each carry attributes Trump might value — name recognition, combative posture, or past prosecutions — even if they present confirmation risks.
- Relative candidate analysis (blindly): - *Lee Zeldin* — ex‑Congressman, recent visibility, openly close to Trump faction. Has strong political profile and media skills; his move to AG is plausible if Trump wants a high‑profile, politically combative AG. Confirmation could be contested but not impossible if GOP senators back him. - *Ron DeSantis* — major presidential profile. Unlikely to accept AG (a Cabinet post would typically be beneath his current national political ambitions), but cannot be fully discounted if political circumstances change. - *Jeanine Pirro* — media presence, Trump ally, but age, temperament, and confirmation prospects make her a longshot for a formal AG confirmation. - *Ken Paxton* — prosecution history and legal entanglements make him politically useful but possibly unconfirmable in the Senate.
- Blind probabilistic assessment (my independent view, ignoring market prices): Todd Blanche 50%, Lee Zeldin 30%, Ron DeSantis 8%, Jeanine Pirro 7%, Ken Paxton 5% — these sum to 100 and reflect relative plausibility given institutional, political, and confirmation dynamics.
**Stage 2 — Market calibration (now look at current market prices and explain divergence):**
- The aggregate market snapshot provided shows Todd Blanche at 73%, Lee Zeldin 7%, DeSantis 3%, Pirro 2%, Paxton 1%. That places nearly three quarters of probability on Blanche. I view this as materially higher than warranted by fundamentals.
- Possible reasons markets are overweighting Blanche: - *Incumbency anchoring:* Market participants may overweight the 'default' path — keep the acting AG — because it requires the least friction and is easiest to execute quickly. - *Information cascades / liquidity concentrations:* Aggregation across Kalshi, Polymarket, Gemini and heavy volume can produce self‑reinforcing pricing; traders who see Blanche at high odds may assume private info or herd into the contract. - *Short-term rumor flows:* There may have been recent leaks or private conversations that temporarily pushed Blanche’s odds up; markets can overreact to ephemeral signals. - *Underpricing of political alternatives:* Markets appear to underweight Zeldin specifically despite public narrative (Polymarket at times showed Zeldin much higher), possibly due to cross‑platform aggregation or stale orders.
- Why the market could still be right or less wrong than I think: - Large volume (~9M contracts) suggests significant liquidity and possibly informed participants. If insiders value certainty/continuity highly, Blanche could indeed be the overwhelming favorite. - Confirmation risk for alternatives (Paxton's legal troubles, Pirro's polarizing profile, DeSantis' presidential trajectory) materially lowers their realistic probabilities, bolstering Blanche.
- Net calibration conclusion: I respect the market signal but see *overconfidence* in Blanche at 73%. I place Blanche at 50%, leaving meaningful chance for Zeldin (30%) and smaller but nontrivial chances for DeSantis (8%), Pirro (7%), and Paxton (5%). The market likely underprices Zeldin and DeSantis and overprices Blanche by ~20–25 percentage points.
- Trading implication (diagnostic, not trading advice): if you accept my model, the largest mispricings are Zeldin (market 7% vs my 30%) and Blanche (market 73% vs my 50%) — i.e., long Zeldin, short Blanche would capture my view. However, heavy volume and potential private signals justify caution.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes 1: Todd Blanche benefits from incumbency and continuity — acting AG status gives him daily control, insider relationships, and the low‑friction path to nomination and confirmation.
- Arguments for Yes 2: Blanche’s prior service under Bondi and lack of major public controversies make him more confirmable than polarizing outsiders, reducing Senate friction risk.
- Arguments for Yes 3: Presidents sometimes prefer a competent, less flashy AG who can execute priorities quietly without becoming a lightning rod — Blanche fits that profile.
Against
- Argument against 1: Trump has a strong track record of choosing politically loyal, media‑savvy nominees who will publicly champion his agenda — Blanche may be seen as insufficiently combative.
- Argument against 2: High public profile alternatives (Zeldin, Pirro) offer political value to Trump that can outweigh confirmation friction if the GOP Senate is aligned.
- Argument against 3: Legal baggage (Paxton) or outside ambitions (DeSantis) can either exclude or produce surprise nominations, keeping the outcome volatile.
Key drivers
- Incumbency advantage and on‑the‑job visibility for Todd Blanche
- Trump’s preference for loyalty and public combative posture (benefits to Zeldin/Pirro)
- Senate confirmation environment (majority composition and appetite for fights)
- Legal/ethical baggage for contenders (Paxton) and political ambitions (DeSantis)
- Timing/rumors and market liquidity that can create over/underreactions
Risk factors
- Private signals or leaks to market participants that the public does not yet know (could justify market prices)
- Changes in Senate composition or willingness to confirm a controversial nominee
- Campaign developments (e.g., DeSantis suspending or pivoting, or Zeldin taking a new position) that alter availability
- Sudden scandals or revelations about any frontrunner (would rapidly reorder probabilities)
- Long time horizon to Jan 20, 2029 — many political shifts can occur between now and appointment
Scenarios
Best case
Blanche is formally nominated and confirmed relatively smoothly. The White House values continuity, the Senate (if GOP‑friendly) sees little to oppose, and the administration avoids a bruising confirmation fight — result: Blanche becomes confirmed AG with bipartisan or party‑line support.
Most likely
A compromise path: Blanche remains the favorite and either is formally nominated or allowed to stay in acting status for an extended period; if the White House seeks a higher‑profile signal, Zeldin becomes the pick and faces contested but ultimately successful confirmation if the GOP Senate coalesces.
Worst case
The White House picks a highly polarizing loyalist (e.g., Paxton or Pirro) who faces immediate, fierce opposition; the nomination stalls or is defeated in the Senate, forcing a scramble and prolonged vacancy or a compromise pick — result: someone outside the current top names wins, or the administration endures reputational/operational disruption at DOJ.
Outcomes
| Outcome | AI | MKT |
|---|---|---|
| Todd Blanche | 50% | 73% |
| Lee Zeldin | 30% | 7% |
| Ron DeSantis | 8% | 3% |
| Jeanine Pirro | 7% | 2% |
| Ken Paxton | 5% | 1% |
More from this day
- FinancialsKalshi13y
Will OpenAI or Anthropic IPO first?
AI25%MKT87%Edge-62HypedI assess a 25% chance that OpenAI will IPO before Anthropic. Anthropic's earlier confidential filing and high probability of a late‑2026 announcement make it the clear favorite to go public first.
- PoliticsKalshi2y
Who will Trump pardon?
AI3%MKT46%Edge-43HypedExtremely unlikely — I assess a low single-digit chance (~3%) that Barron Trump will receive a presidential pardon before Jan 21, 2029; pardons are legally possible absent conviction, but there is no factual or political path that makes this plausible at scale.
- EconomicsKalshi2y
Will there be a Trump economic boom?
AI8%MKT51%Edge-43HypedI assess an 8% chance that U.S. real quarterly GDP (annualized) will exceed 5% in any quarter between Q1 2025 and Q4 2028 — a low-probability tail event driven only by extreme fiscal/monetary shocks, big inventory swings, or large data revisions.