Who will leave Trump's Cabinet next?
Based on reported disengagement, internal friction, and mounting public scrutiny, I assess that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is the single most likely next Cabinet departure — but timing is uncertain. My independent probability for him being the next to leave is 50%.
Analysis
**Stage 1 — Blind analysis (ignore market prices):**
Multiple credible reports portray Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as effectively disengaged from the day-to-day responsibilities of his HHS role: missed weekly meetings, selective involvement only on issues he finds personally compelling, and a pattern of not delivering on highly publicized initiatives. That combination creates both internal and external pressure. Within an administration that has publicly discussed "accountability" and that has a demonstrated history of public personnel churn, a Cabinet member who is perceived as checked-out and not implementing the administration's agenda is unusually vulnerable.
There are plausible mechanisms that make RFK Jr the likeliest next departure. First, *operational dysfunction*: colleagues who must cover for an absent HHS secretary generate pressure to either get him working or replace him. Second, *political optics*: the administration will need to show competence on health (especially if any public-health incidents or policy failures emerge), and a sidelined cabinet secretary undermines that narrative. Third, *reputational risk*: RFK Jr's public profile and controversial views create recurring media cycles that can become a distraction the White House prefers to eliminate before they compound.
At the same time, there are countervailing factors. Trump has historically kept high-profile, idiosyncratic allies when their public persona is politically useful; firing them risks alienating segments of his base and generating protracted media drama. RFK Jr himself may prefer a unilateral resignation over being fired, or may simply be allowed to linger in title while de facto duties are reassigned — which would delay or prevent a formal "next to leave" outcome. Timing matters: the administration's electoral calendar (midterms, 2026-2028 campaign ramp) will influence whether the White House tolerates disruption now or later.
Weighing these considerations, I estimate an independent probability of 50% that RFK Jr will be the *next* Cabinet member to leave. That reflects the strong directional signals in reporting (disengagement + internal friction) tempered by uncertainty over timing, Trump’s idiosyncratic personnel choices, and the real option of an extended soft-exit (kept in title while sidelined).
**Stage 2 — Market calibration (compare to current market prices):**
The market currently assigns RFK Jr 35% as the next leaver. My 50% is materially higher. Possible reasons the market is pricing RFK Jr lower than my view:
- *Risk aversion / ambiguity discount*: Traders may be discounting the clear qualitative signals because there's no formal resignation or firing announcement; bettors shy away from certainties based on reporting alone. - *Trump idiosyncrasy premium*: The market may be accounting for Trump's past tolerance of controversial figures and a preference for keeping media-attracting personalities on staff, which reduces the near-term firing probability. - *Liquidity and popularity effects*: Volume and participant composition can bias prices; a few large bets on other contenders (e.g., Susie Wiles or Lutnick) could suppress RFK Jr price even if fundamentals favor him.
Why the market might nonetheless be right (and I'm wrong):
- *Timing uncertainty*: The market may correctly price the high uncertainty about _when_ any departure happens. My 50% assumes the next departure occurs relatively soon and RFK Jr is the leading candidate; if the next departure is delayed significantly, other internal churn could happen first. - *Other credible contenders*: Susie Wiles and Howard Lutnick are plausible near-term exits depending on campaign restructures or specific scandals that the market may be weighting.
Overall, I view the market as somewhat underpricing RFK Jr's odds given the strength of the disengagement signals and the internal accountability narrative, but I acknowledge the market's legitimate discount for timing uncertainty and Trump's unpredictable behavior.
Arguments
For
- Documented disengagement: credible reporting that RFK Jr. has missed routine meetings and largely "checked out" reduces the practical case for keeping him in an active cabinet role.
- Performance shortfalls: publicly tracked failures to deliver on the administration's health agenda create grounds for internal pushback and justify replacement to maintain operational credibility.
- Cabinet friction: multiple insiders describing mounting tensions increase the chance of an internal initiative to force a change or prompt a resignation.
- High media visibility: his celebrity status means any negative pattern is amplified quickly, increasing political cost for the White House to keep him.
Against
- Trump’s tolerance for controversial, media-drawing aides may lead him to keep RFK Jr. for profile reasons despite operational dysfunction.
- No single public triggering scandal or crisis has yet forced an immediate decision; without a clear catalyst, changes can be postponed indefinitely.
- RFK Jr. could opt to resign on his own timing, which might push his departure beyond when he would be the 'next' to leave (allowing someone else to depart first).
- Reassigning duties informally allows the administration to neutralize the problem without a formal exit, reducing the chance he is officially recorded as the "next to leave."
Key drivers
- RFK Jr.'s level of day-to-day engagement and attendance at required meetings
- Internal Cabinet pressure and calls for accountability from senior aides
- Media attention and fact-checking that highlight unfulfilled initiatives (erosion of political cover)
- Trump's political calculus (benefit of retaining high-profile allies vs. cost of distraction)
- Timing relative to electoral calendar (midterms/2026, 2028 campaign considerations)
Risk factors
- Unpredictability of Trump’s personnel decisions — historical tolerance for controversial figures
- Absence of a triggering event (scandal, policy crisis, health emergency) that forces an immediate change
- Possibility of a 'soft exit' where duties are reassigned but no formal departure is recorded for a long time
- Market/liquidity dynamics that reflect hedge behavior rather than true assessment of likelihood
Scenarios
Best case
RFK Jr. formally leaves within the next few months via resignation or dismissal. The administration replaces him with a lower-profile, more operationally-focused HHS leader, stabilizing health policy execution and reducing media distractions.
Most likely
RFK Jr. is the most probable next departure but timing is uncertain: he either resigns under increasing internal pressure or is quietly pushed out within 6–18 months. Before that formal exit occurs, there is a realistic chance of smaller churn elsewhere (e.g., a campaign or advisory figure) that briefly competes for the "next"-to-leave designation.
Worst case
RFK Jr. remains in title while responsibilities are quietly redistributed, delaying any formal exit. Another high-profile figure leaves first or instability persists across the Cabinet, creating prolonged operational and political friction for the administration.
Outcomes
| Outcome | AI | MKT |
|---|---|---|
| Robert F. Kennedy Jr. | 50% | 35% |
| Susie Wiles | 20% | 20% |
| Howard Lutnick | 18% | 18% |
| Brooke Rollins | 7% | 3% |
| Pete Hegseth | 5% | 2% |
More from this day
- FinancialsKalshi1y
What sector will SpaceX be assigned to in the S&P?
AI6%MKT95%Edge-89HypedI assess a low probability (~6%) that SpaceX will be assigned to Communication Services; the preponderance of evidence (Morningstar/CRSP and GICS-style classification logic) points to an Industrials assignment.
- CompaniesKalshi1y
Starbucks total global stores in 2026
AI45%MKT7%Edge+38Hidden GemBased on likely baseline store counts and plausible net openings in 2025–2026, I assess a ~45% chance Starbucks will report >41,800 global stores in its 2026 report — materially higher than the current market price (7% Yes).
- politicsPolymarketEnded
Iran agrees to end enrichment of uranium by June 30?
AI25%MKT60%Edge-35HypedI assess a 25% probability that Iran will publicly agree to end all uranium enrichment by June 30, 2026; a temporary or narrowly framed pledge could happen, but structural incentives, domestic politics, and verification hurdles make a full public pledge unlikely within the short remaining window.