Who will be Trump's next Attorney General?
I assess **Todd Blanche** as the most likely nominee and eventual Attorney General — I assign him a 72% chance based on incumbency as acting AG, Trump's prior relationship, and a GOP-controlled Senate pathway to confirmation.
Analysis
**Stage 1 — Blind analysis (ignore market prices):**
- Background facts: reporting consistently identifies **Todd Blanche** as the expected nominee and notes he has been running the Justice Department since April after Pam Bondi's firing. Blanche served as Trump's personal attorney before joining the White House/DOJ staff. A secondary source places **Harmeet Dhillon** on a short list but frames her as an alternative rather than the frontrunner.
- Key structural considerations: The President nominates and the Senate confirms. If the Senate is controlled by Republicans (which is the realistic baseline assumption for a Trump second term), the threshold for confirmation is achievable unless there are significant defections. Blanche’s acting-incumbent status gives him the advantages of visibility, managerial continuity, and the opportunity to demonstrate command of the office and relationships with Senate Republicans.
- Political calculus: Trump has a strong incentive to pick someone he trusts and who has been loyal; Blanche checks both boxes. The risks for Trump in nominating an outside firebrand (e.g., a politician with less DOJ experience) include destabilizing DOJ operations and creating public perception problems. That tilts the scale toward promoting the existing acting AG.
- Independent probability judgment: Balancing strong insider reporting, incumbency advantage, and the confirmation pathway against confirmation risk and the possibility of a last-minute pivot, I estimate a **~72%** probability that Blanche will be Trump’s next Attorney General.
**Stage 2 — Market calibration (compare to market prices):**
- Market snapshot: The market currently places Blanche at 61%, with smaller shares on Zeldin (8%), Pirro (2%), Bailey (2%), and Dhillon (2%). Volume is substantial, suggesting active trading and attention.
- Why the market might be lower than my independent estimate (61% vs my 72%): - Traders may be pricing in confirmation risk or the possibility of a tactical late change to appease specific GOP factions (e.g., nominating a more political or combative figure instead). - The market could be discounting insider reporting as preliminary and giving disproportionate weight to speculative alternative names seen in press cycles. - Some participants may be factoring in reputational/ethics concerns tied to elevating a former personal attorney, expecting some Republican moderates to balk — this produces downward pressure.
- Why I still rate Blanche higher than the market: incumbency as acting AG materially raises the baseline chance of nomination and confirmation. Trump’s incentive to reward loyalty and minimize disruption favors elevating Blanche; Senate dynamics (simple-majority confirmations) make a successful confirmation probable if Republicans remain unified. Given these structural factors, the market appears slightly risk-averse or over-discounting edge-case scenarios — hence my higher independent probability.
- Bottom line: The market is not wildly inconsistent with the facts and is correctly concentrated on Blanche, but I think it underweights incumbency/insider reporting and overweights speculative alternatives; I therefore place Blanche at 72% while acknowledging non-trivial tail risk that keeps the market narrower.
Arguments
For
- Blanche is already acting in the role and thus benefits from the incumbency/continuity advantage.
- He has a pre-existing personal relationship with Trump (former personal attorney), increasing Trump’s inclination to nominate him.
- Reporting explicitly identifies Blanche as the expected nominee; multiple independent outlets frame him as the frontrunner.
- If Republicans control the Senate and remain unified, confirmation is politically feasible and likely.
Against
- Elevating a former personal attorney creates optics and ethical issues that could prompt moderate Republican hesitation or Democratic opposition.
- A narrow Senate majority or internal GOP divisions could produce an unexpectedly close confirmation fight or force a different nominee.
- Speculative contenders (e.g., Harmeet Dhillon) exist and could be substituted to satisfy internal party pressures or to pursue a more combative legal posture.
- Late-breaking damaging reporting or new revelations about Blanche’s prior work could derail a nomination.
Key drivers
- Trump's personal preference and trust in Blanche (strong positive driver)
- Blanche's incumbency as acting AG since April (operational continuity advantage)
- Senate partisan composition and unity among Senate Republicans (confirmation pathway)
- Political optics and ethics concerns around elevating a former personal attorney (source of resistance)
- Alternative short-list candidates and intra-party factional demands (could create a pivot)
Risk factors
- Senate defections or close majority dynamics that raise confirmation uncertainty
- Emergence of damaging reporting or ethical questions about Blanche late in the process
- A strategic last-minute nomination switch by Trump to appease base factions or allies
- Legal conflicts of interest or recusal issues that make Blanche a politically risky choice
Scenarios
Best case
Blanche is formally nominated within weeks, faces a managed confirmation process with party-line or near-party-line votes, and is confirmed quickly. DOJ leadership continuity minimizes disruption; Blanche implements priorities aligned with the administration.
Most likely
Blanche is nominated and confirmed, but not without some political blowback and noisy opposition. The final vote is narrower than comfortable for the administration, and Blanche begins tenure with partisan tensions and close scrutiny from both Congress and the media.
Worst case
Blanche is nominated but significant ethical or legal controversies surface, several Republicans defect, or procedural obstacles arise; the nomination is withdrawn or defeated and Trump pivots to a more political alternative (e.g., Dhillon or Zeldin), producing a protracted confirmation battle and instability at DOJ.
Outcomes
| Outcome | AI | MKT |
|---|---|---|
| Todd Blanche | 72% | 61% |
| Lee Zeldin | 6% | 8% |
| Jeanine Pirro | 3% | 2% |
| Andrew Bailey | 4% | 2% |
| Harmeet Dhillon | 15% | 2% |
More from this day
- PoliticsKalshi18y
Which G7 leader will leave next?
AI22%MKT75%Edge-53HypedI assess a substantially lower chance than the market that the UK Prime Minister will be the first G7 leader to leave office; I estimate ~22% for the UK PM being first, with Japan's leader (Sanae Takaichi) the single largest individual risk.
- PoliticsKalshi1y
2026: Trump's bad year?
AI60%MKT15%Edge+45Hidden GemI assess a better-than-even chance (60%) that 2026 will look like a genuine ‘bear year’ for Trump — characterized by sustained legal and institutional setbacks, damaging headlines, and meaningful reputational/operational pain — even if it stops short of catastrophic criminal or financial collapse.
- cryptoPolymarketEnded
Bitcoin above ___ on June 8?
AI68%MKT33%Edge+35Hidden GemI assess a 68% chance that the Binance BTC/USDT 1-minute close at 12:00 ET on June 8 will be above $62,000, slightly higher than the market-implied probability due to the single-minute resolution and recent structural bid-support in the market.