Will Trump be impeached and removed from office?
Independent estimate: low probability. Given the very high bar for removal (a 2/3 Senate conviction) and strong historical reluctance of senators to remove a president from office, I assess a modest chance that Trump will be both impeached and removed before his term ends.
Analysis
**Stage 1 — Blind analysis (independent assessment ignoring market price):**
I treat this as a two-step event: (A) the House of Representatives votes to impeach, and (B) the Senate convicts and removes the president before the term ends (2029-01-20T15:00:00Z). Each step has distinct political mechanics and probabilities.
Key points informing my independent probability:
- *Impeachment in the House is relatively attainable politically.* The House needs a simple majority to impeach; historically, impeachment is a partisan decision driven by House majority incentives. If the president’s party loses the House or a substantial number of House members from his party defect, an impeachment vote becomes plausible. Political actors (opposition party, caucuses motivated by legal or reputational concerns, activist coalitions) can marshal impeachment articles when they believe the political cost of inaction exceeds the cost of pursuing removal. Given that impeachment has been used multiple times in modern political cycles as a tool of accountability or political signaling, the base chance of an impeachment vote during a controversial presidency is moderate.
- *Removal by the Senate is extremely difficult.* Conviction requires a two-thirds majority (67 votes) in the 100-member Senate. Historically, senators are reluctant to remove a president of the opposing party absent overwhelming, bipartisan consensus (which is rare). Partisan loyalty, reelection incentives, and the constitutional seriousness of removal raise the evidentiary and political bar well above that needed to secure impeachment in the House. Even when articles of impeachment pass the House, conviction in the Senate has not occurred for a full U.S. president in modern history.
- *The combination (impeachment AND removal) is the crucial product.* If I separately estimate the probability of House impeachment during the term at roughly 25–35% (depending on evolving facts and House control), and the conditional probability of Senate conviction given impeachment at roughly 10–20% under plausible political splits (likely much lower if the president’s party holds a Senate majority), the product yields a low overall probability. Multiplying midpoints (30% * 15%) yields 4.5%; using somewhat more permissive numbers (35% * 35%) yields ~12%. Accounting for the possibility of extraordinarily damning events that could drive bipartisan conviction pushes the tail higher, but these are low-likelihood events.
Aggregate independent judgment: **12%** chance that Trump will be impeached and removed before his term ends. This reflects a moderate chance of impeachment in the House but a very low chance of achieving the 2/3 Senate conviction necessary for removal.
**Stage 2 — Market calibration (after viewing current market price):**
Current market: Yes 20%, No 80% (Yes priced at 0.20). My independent probability (12%) is substantially lower than the market price (20%). Possible reasons the market is pricing higher:
- *Overweighting of activism and media narratives:* Market participants may conflate high-profile legal challenges, advocacy pushes (e.g., Removal Coalition), or polls showing public desire for impeachment with the political likelihood of both impeachment and Senate conviction. Public pressure and media attention can increase perceived risk even if it rarely translates into the necessary Senate defections.
- *Misunderstanding of the required mechanics:* Some traders might treat impeachment alone (House vote) as the event or misunderstand that removal requires a 67-vote conviction. If traders interpret “impeached and removed” as simply impeached, that would push the Yes price up relative to the true event definition.
- *Speculative or hedging flows:* Large-volume traders or partisan bettors might drive price via directional bets unrelated to neutral probability estimates—especially given the high-profile nature of the event and elevated political volatility. High event volume (~475k contracts) suggests active interest; part of that could be ideologically driven rather than signal-driven.
- *Tail-risk consideration:* Markets sometimes assign outsized probability to low-frequency, high-impact political shocks (e.g., sudden revelations that prompt bipartisan scandal). The market price may implicitly embed a higher tail probability than I consider plausible.
Given these factors, I conclude the market is likely overpriced on the Yes outcome relative to a sober political-institution analysis. If you are trading, this suggests *selling* Yes (or buying No) may be attractive if you agree my priors and conditional assumptions about Senate behavior. However, remain alert to factual catalysts (e.g., a major bipartisan criminal referral with incontrovertible evidence) that would rapidly raise the conditional probability of conviction.
Arguments
For
- There is an activist and political constituency that repeatedly pushes for impeachment in response to allegations; this increases the baseline chance the House will bring articles.
- Ongoing or future legal and investigative developments could produce evidence sharp enough to change the political calculus quickly, forcing House leadership into an impeachment vote.
- If the president’s party loses effective control of the House (through elections or defections), an impeachment vote becomes substantially more likely.
- Severe national-security or constitutional violations (a high-impact shock) could create bipartisan pressure on senators, raising the low baseline chance of conviction.
Against
- Removal requires a two-thirds Senate vote—an extremely high threshold that has historically been unmet, making conviction and removal rare events.
- Partisan loyalty and senators’ reelection incentives strongly discourage many senators from voting to remove a president of their own party absent overwhelming proof.
- Past impeachment episodes demonstrate that House impeachment does not reliably translate into Senate conviction; impeachment without removal is the far more common outcome.
- Public opinion alone is insufficient to force removal; senators often act on strategic incentives rather than short-term polling, particularly in polarized environments.
- Market signals and advocacy campaigns can overstate the probability of removal by confusing impeachment with removal or by amplifying low-probability tail events.
Key drivers
- Control of the House of Representatives (which determines feasibility of initiating and passing articles of impeachment).
- Senate composition and the number of Republican defections required to reach a 2/3 majority for conviction.
- Emergence of new, strong bipartisan evidence or events that substantially change senators' incentives (criminal findings, disclosures, or national security breaches).
- Public opinion and political cost calculations for individual senators around reelection timing and state-level electorates.
Risk factors
- Rapidly unfolding legal events or disclosures that provide clear, bipartisan-appealing evidence of impeachable conduct.
- Unexpected changes in congressional control due to special elections, resignations, or shifts in party affiliation during the term.
- Misinterpretation of the market question by traders (confusing impeachment alone with impeachment + removal).
- Highly polarized media cycles that amplify low-probability but high-impact narratives and drive speculative market flows.
Scenarios
Best case
For the 'Yes' outcome: A rapid, highly credible set of revelations or a conclusive bipartisan criminal referral emerges (e.g., corroborated evidence of serious constitutional violations or abuse of power) that persuades a substantial bloc of senators from the president’s party to vote for conviction. The House impeaches swiftly and the Senate, facing overwhelming political pressure and incontrovertible evidence, convicts and removes the president before the term ends.
Most likely
A middle outcome where impeachment articles are possible (and at times likely) in the House depending on evolving investigations and political control, but the Senate falls short of the 2/3 threshold. This yields impeachments without removal or no impeachment at all, resulting in the 'No' outcome for the combined question.
Worst case
For the 'No' outcome: Political dynamics remain stable. The president’s party retains or regains sufficient control of the House to block impeachment, or the House impeaches but the Senate refuses to convict due to partisan cohesion and strategic incentive alignment. No new bipartisan-defining evidence emerges, and the president completes the term with no removal.
More from this day
- economyPolymarket3mo
How high will inflation get in 2026?
AI25%MKT98%Edge-73HypedI assess a substantially below-market probability that headline CPI will exceed 4% in any month of 2026; the baseline is continued disinflation with meaningful upside-tail risks from energy, supply shocks, or sudden demand acceleration.
- PoliticsKalshi18y
Which G7 leader will leave next?
AI18%MKT77%Edge-59HypedIndependent view: the UK Prime Minister is unlikely to be the next G7 leader to leave — other leaders (notably Emmanuel Macron and Italy's Giorgia Meloni) carry higher short-to-medium term exit risk. I assign the UK PM a substantially lower probability than the current market.
- FinancialsKalshi13y
Will OpenAI or Anthropic IPO first?
AI70%MKT29%Edge+41Hidden GemI assess ~70% chance that OpenAI will IPO before Anthropic. OpenAI shows clearer preparatory work, stronger near-term monetization paths, and investor incentives to pursue a public listing sooner than Anthropic.