How many Fed rate cuts in 2026?
I think there is a strong chance the Fed finishes 2026 without any cuts, but the probability is not as close to certain as the market implies. The balance of recent commentary still points more toward policy staying restrictive or even tightening than toward easing, yet a late-year growth or labor-market deterioration could still force cuts.
Analysis
The strongest argument for no rate cuts in 2026 is that the Fed’s recent messaging remains meaningfully hawkish. Officials are still describing policy as needing to stay restrictive, and several comments suggest the next meaningful move could be another hike rather than an easing cycle. That matters a lot for this market because the question is not whether the Fed is done tightening forever, but whether it will take any step down in rates during the year. If policymakers still see inflation or financial conditions as too loose, the default path is a hold or another hike, both of which preserve the “no cuts” outcome.
There is also a timing argument in favor of no cuts. With only a limited number of meetings left in 2026, the Fed would need a fairly clear and persistent deterioration in the data to move from a restrictive stance to actual cuts. Recent reports suggest the dominant policy debate is still about whether the Fed pauses or hikes again, which implies cuts are not yet the base case inside the Committee. In addition, some analysts expect the Fed to remain on hold well into 2027, and that kind of forecast aligns with a year that ends with no easing at all.
Against that view, the main risk is that monetary policy can turn quickly if labor market weakness or a broader slowdown accelerates. The recent drop in hike odds after softer jobs data shows that traders are already sensitive to downside surprises, and a couple more weak prints could shift the debate from “hold or hike” to “how soon do cuts begin.” Because the market question covers the full year, even a late-2026 cut would overturn the yes outcome, so the tail risk of a sharp macro slowdown still matters. That is why I am comfortable with a high probability for no cuts, but not so high that I would treat the outcome as nearly locked in.
The current market price implies an even higher chance of no cuts than my estimate, and I think that is somewhat aggressive. The Fed’s bias today still leans against easing, but the economy has reached a stage where policy errors can show up quickly in employment and growth data. In other words, the most likely path is still no cuts, but the distribution has enough downside risk that a mid-to-late-year pivot cannot be dismissed.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: Recent Fed commentary is still more consistent with holding rates or hiking than with cutting.
- Arguments for Yes: The policy path appears to require a substantial data deterioration before any easing becomes likely.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: Weak economic or labor data could force the Fed to cut later in 2026.
- Arguments against Yes: A year-end policy reversal is possible if inflation cools enough to give the Fed room to ease.
Key drivers
- Fed officials are still sounding hawkish, which keeps cuts off the near-term base case.
- The remaining 2026 meetings leave limited time for the Fed to pivot unless the data weaken materially.
- Softening labor-market or growth data could quickly force the Fed toward easing late in the year.
Risk factors
- A sharper-than-expected slowdown in employment or spending could trigger one or more cuts.
- If inflation falls faster than expected, the Fed may decide it has room to ease before year-end.
Scenarios
Best case
The economy stays resilient, inflation remains sticky enough to keep policymakers cautious, and the Fed either holds steady or hikes once more, leaving 2026 with zero cuts.
Most likely
The Fed spends most or all of 2026 on hold with a hawkish bias, and the year closes without any rate cuts unless there is a late, pronounced deterioration in the data.
Worst case
Growth slows sharply or the labor market softens enough that the Fed cuts rates before year-end, causing the no-cuts outcome to fail.
More from this day
- economyPolymarket3mo
What will the median home value in the LA Metro area be on December 31?
AI78%MKT17%Edge+61Hidden GemLos Angeles Metro home values appear to be comfortably below the $1,115,000 threshold and the recent trend has been soft rather than accelerating. I would assign a high probability to Yes, though not near certainty because the exact settlement uses a specific index that can differ from headline sale or listing prices.
- SportsKalshi3d
BAL Ravens vs ATL Falcons: Spread
AI18%MKT59%Edge-41HypedAtlanta winning by 3 or more points looks unlikely against a Ravens team that is favored by roughly a field goal or more. My estimate is well below the market price, because the question requires an outright Falcons margin victory, not a cover.
- SportsKalshiToday
Game 3: Cleveland vs Chicago WS
AI88%MKT51%Edge+37Hidden GemChicago is in an overwhelmingly strong position with a 2-0 series lead in a best-of-five, plus home field for the next two games. I գնահատ estimate Chicago wins the series about 88% of the time, far above the current market price.