Will Trump end the Federal Reserve?
The odds that Trump actually ends the Federal Reserve before January 20, 2029 are extremely low. He may attack the Fed rhetorically or try to reshape it, but abolishing it would require an extraordinary political and legal sequence that is very unlikely to happen.
Analysis
This is one of those questions where the institutional barriers are so high that the default answer is near-zero. Ending the Federal Reserve would require not just presidential hostility, but durable control of Congress, a coherent legislative replacement for the U.S. monetary authority, survival through judicial and administrative challenges, and an acceptance by markets and the broader policy apparatus that is hard to imagine. Even presidents deeply dissatisfied with the Fed typically end up pressuring it, appointing sympathetic governors, or trying to narrow its independence rather than eliminating it entirely.
Trump has historically been critical of the Fed and has shown a willingness to use rhetoric, personnel pressure, and administrative leverage against independent institutions. That makes some nonzero probability appropriate if the market question were framed as weakening or politicizing the Fed. But “end the Federal Reserve” is far more extreme than changing leadership or policy direction. The most plausible pathways are political theater, attempted reform, or confrontation over rates and appointments, not the actual termination of the central bank as an institution.
Against the current market price, I think the market is assigning too much probability to a dramatic constitutional and legislative rupture. A 6.8% yes price implies a meaningful chance of outright abolition, which seems far above what historical precedent and institutional inertia justify. The market may be pricing in tail-risk from a second Trump term and assuming that extreme rhetoric can translate into extreme policy, but the gap between attacking the Fed and ending it is vast. My assessment is closer to 2%, reflecting a very small but nonzero chance of an unprecedented political crisis or statutory restructuring being interpreted as the Fed being ended.
Arguments
For
- Trump has repeatedly signaled hostility toward Fed independence, which raises the tail risk of aggressive institutional confrontation.
- If he returns to office with strong partisan control and a crisis narrative, extraordinary legislative proposals could become more plausible than usual.
Against
- Ending the Federal Reserve would require passing or sustaining changes that are politically and legally far more difficult than ordinary executive actions.
- The incentives of Congress, Treasury, financial markets, and the courts all strongly favor preserving the Fed as a core institution.
Key drivers
- Abolishing the Fed would require sustained congressional action, not just presidential intent.
- Trump’s history suggests pressure on the Fed is plausible, but outright elimination is still far beyond normal political bounds.
Risk factors
- A landslide election, unified government, and severe economic crisis could create unusual momentum for radical institutional change.
- The market question may be interpreted loosely if a major restructuring or replacement is treated as the Fed being ended.
Scenarios
Best case
Trump wins enough political support to force major changes in Fed leadership or mandate, creating the appearance of ending Fed independence without formally abolishing the institution.
Most likely
Trump criticizes the Fed, tries to influence appointments and policy, and may support reforms, but the Federal Reserve remains intact and functioning through the deadline.
Worst case
Trump loses power, faces legislative resistance, or limits himself to rhetoric and pressure while the Federal Reserve continues operating unchanged.
More from this day
- PoliticsKalshi2y
Which agencies will Trump eliminate?
AI87%MKT19%Edge+68Hidden GemI assess a high likelihood that the market’s Yes outcome occurs, because the available evidence suggests USAID has already been functionally eliminated during Trump’s term and remaining obstacles look mostly legal or semantic rather than operational. The main uncertainty is whether the market resolves “eliminated” as formal statutory repeal versus de facto shutdown and absorption into State.
- PoliticsKalshi1y
Which state will vote first in the 2028 Democratic presidential primary?
AI33%MKT89%Edge-56HypedThe evidence favors New Hampshire not being the first Democratic contest in 2028. Recent calendar reporting points to South Carolina first, with New Hampshire early but not earliest.
- pop culturePolymarketEnded
#2 Spotify song in the US this week? (September 18)
AI38%MKT87%Edge-49HypedBbY WOW has strong momentum and could plausibly land at number two, but the U.S. streaming evidence still suggests it is more likely to sit just behind a stronger domestic leader rather than clearly control the runner-up spot. I would price a moderate chance rather than a favorite outcome.