Fed decision in Dec 2027?
I think the Fed is more likely than the market implies to leave rates unchanged in December 2027, with the main alternatives being a modest cut rather than any hike. A hold is still the modal outcome, but the path to a 2027 hike looks comparatively weak given the evidence provided.
Analysis
The evidence in the supplied context points to a Fed that is still more likely to be in a holding or easing posture by late 2027 than in a renewed hiking cycle. The most relevant survey signal is that a majority of economists expected the Fed to hold through the end of 2027, and even the more hawkish commentary in the results is concentrated in 2026 rather than 2027. That matters because a December 2027 hike would require not just persistent inflation, but enough re-acceleration in growth or financial conditions to reverse an already delayed easing/steady-state path over a long horizon.
The main case against a hold is that several banks have recently shifted more hawkish for the nearer-term path, which raises the possibility that the starting point in 2027 could still be relatively restrictive. If inflation proves sticky, the Fed could indeed keep policy tighter for longer or even hike later than expected. But in the information given, those hawkish views mostly support an additional hike or two in 2026, not a December 2027 increase, and Goldman’s own revised call in the results leaned toward cuts in 2027 rather than hikes.
Compared with the current market price of 77% for no change, I think the market is directionally right but a bit too cautious about the chance of a hold. My independent estimate puts the hold closer to the low 80s because the sourced commentary lacks a strong 2027 hike thesis and because policy is more likely to be neutral or easing by then. The market may be over-weighting the recent hawkish revision cycle and under-weighting the long lead time, during which macro conditions can normalize or soften enough to keep the Fed on pause.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: The strongest available survey signal favors no change through end-2027, which directly supports a hold in December 2027.
- Arguments for Yes: Even the hawkish sell-side revisions in the context mostly imply earlier hikes or later cuts, not a December 2027 increase.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: If the 2026 hiking cycle starts earlier or runs hotter than expected, the 2027 policy rate could still be on an upward path.
- Arguments against Yes: Persistent inflation or renewed demand strength could make a late-2027 hike more plausible than the survey consensus suggests.
Key drivers
- Survey evidence in the provided context points to a majority expecting the Fed to hold through the end of 2027.
- The hawkish revisions cited are mostly about 2026 timing, not a December 2027 hike specifically.
Risk factors
- Inflation could stay sticky enough that the Fed is still forced to tighten in late 2027.
- A strong growth or fiscal reacceleration could keep policy restrictive and delay any easing.
Scenarios
Best case
Inflation moderates and growth cools enough that the Fed stays on hold through 2027, with cuts becoming more likely than hikes by year-end.
Most likely
The Fed is still holding steady in December 2027, with the balance of risks tilted slightly toward eventual cuts rather than any hike.
Worst case
Inflation re-accelerates or growth stays too hot, forcing the Fed to hike again in late 2027 after a tighter-than-expected 2026.
Outcomes
| Outcome | AI | MKT |
|---|---|---|
| Fed maintains rate | 82% | 77% |
| Hike 25bps | 10% | 9% |
| Cut >25bps | 4% | 8% |
| Cut 25bps | 3% | 8% |
| Hike >25bps | 1% | 8% |
More from this day
- PoliticsKalshi2y
Which agencies will Trump eliminate?
AI87%MKT19%Edge+68Hidden GemI assess a high likelihood that the market’s Yes outcome occurs, because the available evidence suggests USAID has already been functionally eliminated during Trump’s term and remaining obstacles look mostly legal or semantic rather than operational. The main uncertainty is whether the market resolves “eliminated” as formal statutory repeal versus de facto shutdown and absorption into State.
- PoliticsKalshi1y
Which state will vote first in the 2028 Democratic presidential primary?
AI33%MKT89%Edge-56HypedThe evidence favors New Hampshire not being the first Democratic contest in 2028. Recent calendar reporting points to South Carolina first, with New Hampshire early but not earliest.
- pop culturePolymarketEnded
#2 Spotify song in the US this week? (September 18)
AI38%MKT87%Edge-49HypedBbY WOW has strong momentum and could plausibly land at number two, but the U.S. streaming evidence still suggests it is more likely to sit just behind a stronger domestic leader rather than clearly control the runner-up spot. I would price a moderate chance rather than a favorite outcome.