Will OpenAI or Anthropic IPO first?
I make this market a clear Yes, but not as high as the current price. Anthropic appears modestly more likely to IPO first, though OpenAI’s 2027 guidance and confidential filing keep the race closer than the market implies.
Analysis
The core case for Yes is that Anthropic appears to have the stronger near-term IPO catalyst. Recent reporting says Anthropic has already confidentially filed and is being discussed as potentially going public as soon as September or fall 2026, while OpenAI’s own CFO has framed public-company status as a 2027 event, even if sooner is possible. In a race where timing matters more than ultimate ambition, the company with the earlier plausible window generally deserves the advantage.
OpenAI still has a meaningful path to winning this race, and that is what keeps the probability below the market’s enthusiasm for a near-lock. It has also confidentially filed, its growth narrative is stronger, and management could accelerate if market conditions stay favorable. But the company’s own messaging points to patience, and large valuation aspirations could encourage waiting for a cleaner tape and better operating metrics before listing.
Compared with the current market price of 91%, this looks somewhat overpriced on the Yes side. A 91% price implies Anthropic almost surely beats OpenAI, yet the evidence supports a strong preference rather than near certainty; OpenAI’s filing, public-company aspiration, and ability to surprise earlier all preserve a real chance of first-mover status. The market likely overweights the current momentum narrative and underweights how often highly valued private companies delay or sequence IPOs around valuation and market windows rather than internal readiness alone.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: Anthropic has the stronger reported near-term timetable, including talk of a fall 2026 or even September 2026 listing.
- Arguments for Yes: OpenAI’s own guidance leans later, which makes Anthropic the more plausible first mover.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: OpenAI has also filed confidentially and could move faster than its stated 2027 framing if conditions improve.
- Arguments against Yes: The market may already be pricing in Anthropic’s advantage so heavily that the remaining upside on Yes is smaller than it looks.
Key drivers
- Anthropic appears to have the earlier reported listing window, which is the most direct edge in a first-IPO race.
- OpenAI has publicly pointed to 2027 or sooner, which still leaves room for an earlier-than-expected debut but not a clear near-term lead.
Risk factors
- OpenAI could accelerate if it wants to lock in investor enthusiasm before market conditions change.
- Either company could delay for valuation or strategic reasons, making current IPO timing signals less reliable than they appear.
Scenarios
Best case
Anthropic files and lists on an accelerated schedule while OpenAI stays on its more cautious 2027 track, making Anthropic the uncontested first IPO.
Most likely
Anthropic reaches the public markets first, but not by a huge margin, because OpenAI remains capable of pulling forward timing if it chooses.
Worst case
OpenAI surprises with an earlier listing window, perhaps to capture market demand or preempt delays, and gets to public markets before Anthropic.
More from this day
- politicsPolymarket3mo
Google Maps renames Lake Ontario to "Lake America" by...?
AI5%MKT95%Edge-90HypedThis looks overwhelmingly unlikely. Google Maps would need to roll out a broad, production-level U.S. renaming of a major international lake within months, and there is no sign of that happening.
- pop culturePolymarketEnded
"Spider-Man: Brand New Day" 5th Weekend Box Office
AI90%MKT3%Edge+87Hidden GemThe under-20m outcome looks strongly favored for a Spider-Man film in its fifth weekend. Unless it is holding far better than typical superhero releases, the domestic weekend should be comfortably below the threshold.
- pop culturePolymarketEnded
"The Dog Stars" Opening Weekend Box Office
AI41%MKT93%Edge-52HypedThe under on 8 million is plausible, but the broader tracking picture still leans a bit above that line. I think the market is slightly overpricing the chance of a sub-8 million opening, so I put Yes at 41%.