Which agencies will Trump eliminate?
I estimate a low but nontrivial chance that USAID is effectively eliminated before Trump’s term ends, with the best reading being that the agency is sharply reduced, reorganized, or absorbed rather than cleanly abolished. The market’s 30% Yes price looks a bit too high for full elimination, but not absurd if one interprets the question loosely as functional dismantling.
Analysis
USAID is a politically vulnerable target because it is associated with foreign aid spending that many Trump-aligned voters and officials have long criticized as wasteful or ideologically misaligned. If the administration has both the political will and control over the executive branch, it could attempt a major restructuring, budgetary strangulation, or transfer of functions that would make the agency look eliminated in practice even if not formally repealed by Congress.
The main constraint is legal and institutional inertia. A true elimination of USAID as a federal agency would likely run into Congress, appropriations rules, administrative-law challenges, and the practical problem that foreign assistance programs are embedded in a broader diplomatic and security architecture. That makes outright abolition materially harder than rhetoric suggests, and historically agencies are more often weakened, merged, or hollowed out than fully erased.
Compared with the current market price of 30% for Yes, the market seems to be pricing a meaningful chance of aggressive executive action or semantic interpretation of “eliminated.” My independent view is lower because formal elimination is difficult and politically costly, but the probability is not negligible given Trump’s record of pursuing disruptive reorganizations and the possibility that the market is treating a near-total gutting of USAID as equivalent to elimination. The most likely outcome is severe downsizing or reclassification rather than a clean legal shutdown.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: USAID is an obvious ideological target for an administration focused on cutting foreign aid and bureaucracy.
- Arguments for Yes: An executive-driven transfer, merger, or shutdown of core functions could satisfy some market resolution standards even without a classic statutory repeal.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: Formal elimination of a federal agency usually requires congressional action and faces substantial legal hurdles.
- Arguments against Yes: The administration may choose a less risky path of shrinking or repurposing USAID instead of trying to abolish it outright.
Key drivers
- Trump’s willingness to target foreign-aid institutions and signal symbolic spending cuts.
- The legal difficulty of abolishing a federal agency without Congress and the likelihood of court or bureaucratic resistance.
Risk factors
- The market may interpret deep restructuring or de facto hollowing-out as elimination, which would raise the chance of a Yes resolution.
- A strong second-term mandate or aligned congressional action could make a more formal abolition attempt more plausible than expected.
Scenarios
Best case
Trump or his administration aggressively strips USAID of staff, budget, and autonomy, and the market ultimately treats that as elimination or near-elimination.
Most likely
USAID is significantly weakened, reorganized, or folded into a broader foreign-policy structure, but remains identifiable enough that a strict elimination question resolves No.
Worst case
USAID survives as a distinct agency with at most modest restructuring, and the elimination attempt never clears legal or political barriers.
More from this day
- pop culturePolymarket3mo
Top Spotify Artist 2026
AI36%MKT88%Edge-52HypedBad Bunny is still a real contender because of his global fanbase and recent streaming strength, but the available evidence does not support treating him as close to certain for 2026 #1. I estimate his chance well below the market price because other mega-artists still look better positioned to finish the year on top.
- EconomicsKalshi7y
US real GDP growth in 2033?
AI58%MKT12%Edge+46Hidden GemThe most likely outcome is that US real GDP growth in 2033 lands in the mid-range, with a meaningful but not dominant chance of a recessionary or very weak-growth year. My independent view is somewhat less bearish than the market on the top-range scenarios, and somewhat more supportive of moderate growth outcomes.
- FinancialsKalshi13y
Will OpenAI or Anthropic IPO first?
AI58%MKT94%Edge-36HypedAnthropic appears slightly more likely to IPO first than OpenAI, despite the market heavily favoring OpenAI. The current price looks directionally plausible on long-term brand recognition but too confident given the reported timing gap and the fact that both companies are still at the confidential-filing stage.