Will Section IV of the 25th Amendment be used during Trump's Presidency?
I put the chance that Section 4 of the 25th Amendment is invoked during Trump’s presidency at 14%. The market price looks too high because the constitutional and political hurdles are enormous, and even serious health or incapacity events would more likely be handled informally than through a formal declaration.
Analysis
Section 4 of the 25th Amendment is an extremely high bar: it requires the vice president and a majority of the cabinet to conclude the president is unable to discharge the powers and duties of office, and it almost certainly triggers an immediate political crisis. That makes it fundamentally different from ordinary health scares, short medical procedures, or temporary absences, which are much easier to handle through Section 3 or simple delegation. Historically, Section 4 has never been used, and the institutional incentives against being the first are strong because the act would be seen as a direct constitutional removal of a sitting president by his own appointees.
Trump’s age and the possibility of medical or cognitive decline do create some real risk, and a presidency that extends through early 2029 leaves enough time for an adverse event to occur. But the key constraint is not only whether Trump might become impaired; it is whether his vice president and cabinet would be willing and able to mount a successful formal challenge. In a highly loyalist political environment, the more likely response to serious concerns is pressure for resignation, limited delegation, or behind-the-scenes management rather than invoking Section 4. Even a major health episode would not automatically translate into constitutional usage.
The 27% market price appears to overstate how often the mechanism would actually be used. That number may be implicitly pricing in the broad possibility of a severe medical or political crisis, but it underweights the fact that Section 4 requires elite coordination, public confrontation, and a level of certainty that is rarely achievable. I would treat the market as somewhat mispriced to the high side, with the most plausible outcomes being no formal invocation even if Trump experiences intermittent incapacity or controversy.
Arguments
For
- Trump will be older and still in a demanding office, which raises the probability of some serious incapacity event before the term ends.
- If his condition becomes unmistakably severe, the vice president and cabinet may feel compelled to use the constitutional mechanism.
Against
- Section 4 is politically explosive and requires a level of consensus that is rarely realistic in a partisan environment.
- Even serious short-term impairments are more likely to be handled through informal delegation or Section 3 rather than a formal declaration of inability.
Key drivers
- Section 4 requires coordinated action by the vice president and cabinet, which is a major institutional and political hurdle.
- Trump’s age increases the chance of health-related disruptions, but most such events would not necessarily lead to a formal constitutional invocation.
- The historical precedent is extremely weak, since Section 4 has never been successfully used.
Risk factors
- A sudden severe medical event, stroke, or clear cognitive collapse could force officials to act more decisively than expected.
- An extraordinary national-security or legal crisis could make cabinet members more willing to pursue a formal transfer of power.
Scenarios
Best case
Trump remains sufficiently functional throughout the term, or any health issues are minor and managed without triggering a formal constitutional process.
Most likely
There may be episodes of concern, medical treatment, or political speculation, but no formal use of Section 4 occurs before the term ends.
Worst case
Trump suffers a major incapacitating event and the vice president plus a cabinet majority conclude they must invoke Section 4, creating a national constitutional crisis.
More from this day
- CompaniesKalshi1y
Starbucks total global stores in 2026
AI62%MKT15%Edge+47Hidden GemStarbucks is materially more likely than the market implies to finish 2026 above 41,800 total global stores. The combination of an already very large base and guidance for 600 to 650 net new global openings makes the threshold look attainable unless closures or execution slippage are unusually heavy.
- EconomicsKalshi11y
US real GDP growth in 2036?
AI64%MKT20%Edge+44Hidden GemThe most likely outcome is moderate positive growth in 2036 rather than near-stagnation or a boom, with the center of gravity in the 1.6% to 2.5% range. The market looks somewhat compressed toward lower-growth outcomes, but not dramatically mispriced unless the contract is tied to a structurally faster-growing emerging economy.
- pop culturePolymarket3mo
Where will 2026 rank among the hottest years on record?
AI27%MKT69%Edge-42Hyped2026 has a real chance to finish near the top of the record list, but beating 2024 to become the single hottest year looks more unlikely than the market implies. I would price Yes at about 27%.