US real GDP growth in 2035?
I see the 1.6% to 2.0% band as the single most likely outcome, with 2.1% to 2.5% still a meaningful but secondary possibility. Relative to the market, I think the central low-2% outcomes are underpriced and the tails are overemphasized.
Analysis
For a 2035 real GDP growth reading, the right anchor is the economy’s long-run potential rather than the latest quarterly noise. The cited baseline around 1.8% and the continued run of sub-2% private forecasts point to a distribution centered in the low-2% range, with 1.6% to 2.0% the most natural mode and 2.1% to 2.5% as the next most plausible band. Recent 2026 data are positive but uneven, which supports a middling growth outlook rather than a strong case for sustained 3%-plus growth by 2035.
Arguments for Yes are that productivity could run a bit hotter over the next decade, and even a modest upside drift from the 1.8% baseline is enough to land in the 2.1% to 2.5% bucket. Long horizons also give enough time for investment, labor-supply gains, or favorable policy to lift trend growth above today’s consensus.
Arguments against Yes are that the best available projection sets still cluster below the target band, and 2035 is more likely to reflect demographic and trend-productivity constraints than a durable boom. That makes the 2.1% to 2.5% range an above-trend outcome rather than the center of gravity, while the market’s tail pricing looks too generous relative to the evidence. On balance, the market appears to be underweighting the low-2% center and slightly overpricing both strong-growth and recessionary tails.
Arguments
For
- A small improvement over the long-run baseline is enough for the 2.1% to 2.5% range to win.
- The economy can still surprise to the upside over a nine-year horizon if capital spending and productivity accelerate.
Against
- The cited long-run projection around 1.8% makes the target band feel slightly too high versus the center of the distribution.
- Recent forecasters still expect sub-2% trend growth, which argues for 1.6% to 2.0% as the more likely bucket.
Key drivers
- Long-run projection baselines around 1.8% anchor the distribution near low-2% growth.
- A modest productivity or labor-force upside over a decade can push the 2035 print into the 2.1% to 2.5% band.
Risk factors
- A productivity surge or unusually strong investment cycle could shift the outcome into 2.6% to 3.0% or higher.
- A recession, policy shock, or persistent demographic drag could pull 2035 growth down into 1.5% or below.
Scenarios
Best case
Productivity and labor-supply gains lift trend growth enough for 2035 real GDP growth to settle in the 2.1% to 2.5% range.
Most likely
Growth clusters around the low-2% trend, with 1.6% to 2.0% slightly more likely than 2.1% to 2.5%.
Worst case
A major slowdown or recessionary sequence leaves 2035 growth at 0.0% or below, or otherwise well under the middle buckets.
Outcomes
| Outcome | AI | MKT |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1% to 2.5% | 24% | 10% |
| 1.6% to 2.0% | 34% | 9% |
| 0.0% or Below | 10% | 8% |
| 2.6% to 3.0% | 18% | 8% |
| 3.1% to 3.5% | 14% | 8% |
More from this day
- CompaniesKalshi1y
Starbucks total global stores in 2026
AI96%MKT9%Edge+87Hidden GemStarbucks is already above the 41,800-store threshold in its latest reported results, and management’s 2026 opening guidance makes an above-threshold 2026 report highly likely. I put the Yes probability at 96%.
- PoliticsKalshi1y
2026: Trump's bad year?
AI68%MKT10%Edge+58Hidden GemTrump already has multiple concrete 2026 setbacks in court, so the bear-case narrative looks more likely than not. The market’s 11% price appears too low unless the event definition is far narrower than the news flow suggests.
- PoliticsKalshi2y
Who will Trump pardon?
AI3%MKT47%Edge-44HypedBarron Trump receiving a presidential pardon by Jan. 21, 2029 looks extremely unlikely absent some new federal legal exposure. My independent estimate is 3%, far below the current market price.