Clarity Act signed into law in 2026?
The CLARITY Act is more likely than not to fall short of becoming law by the end of 2026, though the path is still open if the Senate acts quickly. The market’s 36.5% Yes price looks somewhat low relative to the bill’s progress, but the remaining procedural hurdles and time pressure still make No the likelier outcome.
Analysis
The bill has made meaningful progress: it passed the House in July 2025, the Senate Banking Committee advanced an amended version in May 2026, and it was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar in June 2026, which means it is formally eligible for floor consideration. That is enough legislative momentum to keep the probability of enactment alive, and the recent publication of updated Senate text plus White House openness to an ethics-related provision suggests negotiators are still trying to assemble a viable path forward.
Even so, the central obstacle is that the bill is not yet through the full Senate, and the remaining steps are substantial. The sources say it still needs a 60-vote cloture path, likely reconciliation between Senate committee versions and the House-passed text, and a presidential signature. Multiple recent reports also note that no floor vote is scheduled and that the August recess is an important deadline; missing that window would leave very little time for a complex market-structure bill to clear both chambers and reach the President before year-end.
The market price of 36.5% for Yes reflects this tension, and my assessment is slightly higher because the bill is already much further along than a typical late-stage legislative long shot. However, the remaining coalition problem is still large: reports indicate limited public Democratic support, and anything requiring a filibuster-proof Senate coalition is intrinsically difficult. In practical terms, the most plausible route to Yes is a rapid Senate breakthrough in the coming weeks; absent that, the probability decays quickly as the calendar moves into fall and then year-end.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: the bill has already advanced farther than many major legislative proposals, so it has an active and credible route to final passage.
- Arguments for Yes: updated Senate language and partial White House acceptance of an ethics provision suggest negotiations are still producing movement.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: the Senate still needs to clear a filibuster hurdle, and reports indicate insufficient bipartisan support is the main unresolved problem.
- Arguments against Yes: the legislative calendar is tight, and further reconciliation between House and Senate versions could consume the remaining time in 2026.
Key drivers
- The bill has cleared the House and one Senate committee hurdle, which preserves a real legislative pathway.
- The remaining Senate floor vote and reconciliation steps are time-sensitive and require a broad bipartisan coalition.
Risk factors
- No floor vote is scheduled, so procedural delay alone could kill 2026 enactment.
- A 60-vote Senate threshold makes the bill vulnerable if Democrats do not supply enough support.
Scenarios
Best case
Senate leadership schedules a vote quickly, negotiators secure enough bipartisan support to invoke cloture, both chambers reconcile the text without major delay, and the President signs the bill before year-end.
Most likely
The bill continues to attract attention but fails to complete the full Senate process in time, leaving it un-signed by the end of 2026.
Worst case
The bill remains stuck on the Senate calendar, no acceptable bipartisan deal emerges, and the measure dies or is pushed beyond the December 31, 2026 deadline without enactment.
More from this day
- politicsPolymarket10d
Iran leadership change by...?
AI86%MKT13%Edge+73Hidden GemThe market looks heavily tilted toward Yes because the supplied reporting already indicates that Iran’s top leadership has changed, with Mojtaba Khamenei named as supreme leader or, at minimum, the old leadership structure replaced by an interim council. The main uncertainty is definitional, but under the market’s broad language a Yes outcome is more likely than the current price suggests.
- PoliticsKalshi2y
Who will Trump pardon?
AI8%MKT51%Edge-43HypedI assess a low but nonzero chance that Barron Trump receives a presidential pardon before Jan. 21, 2029, because there is no known underlying criminal case that would make a pardon necessary. The market’s near-even price looks materially too high for a normal pardon outcome.
- PoliticsKalshi1y
2026: Trump's bad year?
AI58%MKT15%Edge+43Hidden GemI make the bear-case outcome moderately likely in 2026, at about 58%, because Trump is facing a growing stack of high-salience legal and institutional reversals rather than a single isolated controversy. The market’s 13% Yes price looks far too low if the event is defined as meaningful negative developments occurring during the year.