Bank of Russia decision in July?
I think a July rate cut is possible but still not the most likely outcome, so I price the Yes side at 32%. The Bank of Russia remains in an easing cycle, but the latest inflation and fuel data make a pause slightly more likely than another cut.
Analysis
Market pricing still leans against a July cut, with Yes at 24%, and that is broadly consistent with the Bank of Russia's cautious posture after it cut the key rate by 25 bp to 14.25% on June 19. The July 1 discussion said the board would reassess further easing based on disinflation, inflation expectations, and domestic and external risks, which signals that another cut is possible but not pre-committed.
Recent inflation data are the main reason to doubt a cut. Rosstat's June reading accelerated to 0.87% month over month and 6.02% year over year, while fuel markets have been under pressure from refinery disruptions and supply measures; in Sevastopol, gasoline prices jumped 30% in a week and nationwide gasoline prices were up 11.6% from the start of the year. Those developments argue for caution because they can feed through to broader goods and services prices.
The counterargument is that disinflation expectations have improved: households' one-year inflation expectation fell to 12.4% in June, businesses' price expectations kept declining, and the central bank said most participants agreed current inflation dynamics created grounds for lower rates. My read is that the board is still in an easing cycle, but the latest inflation and fuel data make a July pause slightly more likely than a cut; I put the cut probability above the market, but still clearly below even odds.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: The central bank already judged that current inflation dynamics created grounds for lower rates, which keeps another cut on the table.
- Arguments for Yes: Household inflation expectations fell to 12.4% in June and business price expectations kept easing, which usually gives policymakers more room to cut.
- Arguments for Yes: The Bank of Russia has already started easing, so a second consecutive cut would fit the recent direction of policy.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: June inflation re-accelerated to 0.87% month over month and 6.02% year over year, which is still uncomfortable for a central bank trying to anchor prices.
- Arguments against Yes: The fuel shock is still live, and the central bank itself said July inflation assessment must factor in the rescheduled housing and utility tariff indexation.
- Arguments against Yes: The bank said stabilizing inflation at target may require a higher key-rate path than assumed in April, which argues for caution rather than another immediate cut.
Key drivers
- June inflation and the early-July weekly price tone are the most important inputs for the July meeting.
- Fuel shortages and higher gasoline prices raise the risk that inflation pressure spreads beyond energy-related items.
- Improving household and business expectations support the case that disinflation is becoming more durable.
- The central bank's own guidance remains conditional, which means the meeting is still data-dependent rather than locked into a cut.
Risk factors
- A bigger-than-expected pass-through from fuel prices could make the board defer easing.
- If July tariff effects and other one-off price pressures show up strongly, the board may choose to wait.
- Faster credit growth could make the central bank worry that easing is too early.
Scenarios
Best case
Inflation expectations keep falling, fuel disruptions prove temporary, and the board delivers another 25 bp cut to 14.00% because it sees room to continue the easing cycle.
Most likely
The board pauses in July and waits for more evidence that the June inflation spike and fuel shock are temporary, even though the easing cycle is not over.
Worst case
Inflation and fuel pass-through stay hot, the board decides the June cut was enough for now, and the key rate is left unchanged at 14.25%.
Outcomes
| Outcome | AI | MKT |
|---|---|---|
| Decrease | 32% | 24% |
| No decrease | 68% | 76% |
More from this day
- HealthKalshi2y
What will the average number of measles cases be during Trump's term?
AI72%MKT28%Edge+44Hidden GemI assess a 72% independent probability that the average annual number of US measles cases across 2025–2028 will meet or exceed ~3,000 per year (i.e., the 'Yes' outcome). This reflects the strong acceleration in 2026, weak policy response, and high-risk pockets that make a sustained multi-year elevated average more likely than not.
- pop culturePolymarketEnded
What will happen before GTA VI?
AI9%MKT51%Edge-42HypedI think the chance of another pandemic before GTA VI is materially below the current market price. The most likely outcome is that today’s outbreaks remain serious but contained, with no event reaching true pandemic status before November 19, 2026.
- EconomicsKalshi2y
Will there be a Trump economic boom?
AI8%MKT50%Edge-42HypedIndependent assessment: very unlikely — I assign an 8% chance that any U.S. quarterly real GDP (annualized) will exceed 5% in Q1 2025–Q4 2028. The data and policy environment point strongly against a sustained or one‑off 5%+ quarter, though low‑probability shocks could still produce a spike.