Will President Trump be impeached during his term?
**Independent assessment:** Given the House is on the floor debating and a vote is scheduled today, I assess a high probability that the House will pass articles of impeachment — this is the event’s decisive trigger — so the independent probability of
Analysis
**Stage 1 — Blind analysis (ignore market prices):**
*Facts and immediate context:* The House is conducting floor debate on articles of impeachment today with a vote expected later today. Under the Constitution, impeachment is complete when a majority of the House votes to adopt articles. A subsequent Senate trial determines removal, not impeachment itself. Given the floor debate and scheduled vote, the procedural path to an impeachment vote is open and active.
*Reasoning toward an independent probability:* The key hurdle to the "Yes" outcome is only a single House majority vote. The existence of a scheduled, widely reported floor vote implies either (a) House leadership believes it has the votes or (b) leadership is prepared to force a vote for political reasons even if razor-thin. Historically, the House has impeached presidents when the majority party was motivated and had sufficient cohesion to carry a motion. The decision to bring articles to the floor typically reflects that leadership has a workable coalition or sees strategic value in making the vote regardless of marginal risk.
I therefore treat the scheduled floor vote as a strong signal that impeachment (the House adopting articles) is far more likely than not. Additional reasons to increase my estimate: - Multiple news outlets report the vote as imminent with no signs of delay or cancellation. - The political incentives for the majority party to hold a vote when leadership has committed are strong; whipping members and using procedural levers is common. - Even if today's vote were to fail narrowly, the House could reintroduce articles later — there is a long window through Jan 20, 2029 for impeachment to occur.
Countervailing considerations that reduce certainty and cap my estimate below 100%: - Narrow majorities and last-minute defections can and do flip expected outcomes. If the majority is slim and some members balk, the vote could fail. - Procedural surprises (tabling, refer to committee, Speaker maneuvering) or a last-minute political deal could avert a floor vote or change its text so it does not achieve passage. - Public and electoral calculations ahead of the 2026 midterms could cause some members to vote against impeachment even if party leadership wants it.
Balancing the strong, immediate procedural signal (floor debate + scheduled vote) against the realistic risk of defections and procedural gambits yields an independent assessment of **~85%** that the President will be impeached by the House before Jan 20, 2029.
**Stage 2 — Market calibration (look at current market price):**
Current market: Yes 0.62 / No 0.38 with heavy volume (≈441k contracts). My independent probability (85%) is substantially higher than the market-implied 62%.
Why the market might be lower than my independent estimate (potential underpricing of Yes): - Traders may be conservatively pricing in the nontrivial chance of last-minute defections or procedural pivots (tabling, referral to committee), especially if the House majority is narrow. Markets often discount outcomes to reflect the structural volatility of legislative votes. - Some traders may be conflating "impeachment" with "removal" (Senate conviction), and therefore underweight the simpler House-majority threshold. Confusion between those concepts can depress the price for the technically easier outcome. - News friction and latency: the vote is imminent within the same trading day; market participants may be waiting for the definitive roll-call result rather than pricing an event that could still flip. Real-time markets can lag breaking procedural votes. - Risk-aversion and liquidation: Traders who bought Yes earlier might be locking profits before the vote, pushing price down temporarily despite high underlying probability.
Why the market could be correctly lower than my independent estimate (market pricing potential upside risks I underweighted): - If leadership has signaled willingness to hold a vote primarily for messaging, they might tolerate a narrow loss to achieve political theater; markets may internalize this play-acting scenario. - There could be credible last-minute commitments from swing members to oppose articles due to counsel, constituent pressure, or private agreements; markets with access to such on-the-ground signals may be right to discount.
Conclusion of calibration: Given the immediacy of the floor vote and the constitutional definition that House passage equals impeachment, I view the current market price (62%) as *conservative* and likely undervaluing the true probability. The most plausible explanation is that the market is factoring in procedural risk, late defections, and trader caution. If the reported floor vote proceeds as publicized and leadership control is sufficient, I expect the market to reprice upward toward the high 70s–90s after the roll-call results.
(For clarity: my reported prediction_percentage above is my independent assessment, not a reflection of the market price.)
Arguments
For
- The House is actively on the floor debating and has scheduled a vote — this is the proximate, procedural trigger that normally precedes adoption.
- Leadership generally brings articles to the floor only when it expects either to win or to secure political cover; the fact that the vote is scheduled strongly signals sufficient support.
- Impeachment requires only a simple House majority, which is a lower threshold than Senate conviction and is therefore more achievable.
- Even if today's vote failed, the long time window through Jan 20, 2029 leaves ample opportunities for renewed or altered impeachment efforts.
Against
- A narrow or fragile majority could produce enough defections for the articles to fail — close margins are common on high-risk partisan votes.
- House procedural tools (tabling, referrals, rule changes) and last-minute negotiations can delay or derail an expected vote.
- Some members may prioritize electoral risk ahead of the 2026 midterms and vote against impeachment even if leadership pressures them.
- Market participants may have asymmetric information or on-the-ground indicators (private whip counts, personal commitments) that reduce the actual probability compared with publicly visible signals.
Key drivers
- **House vote on the floor scheduled today** — a direct, immediate trigger for impeachment if passed.
- **House party composition and whip counts** — margin of majority and rates of party-line loyalty determine whether a majority exists.
- **Public and electoral pressure ahead of 2026** — member incentives (constituent backlash, midterm calculus) can flip close votes.
- **Leadership’s procedural control** — ability to set rules, amend articles, or compel votes can materially alter outcomes.
Risk factors
- Narrow House majority with potential swing defections among moderates or holdouts.
- Last-minute procedural maneuvers (tabling, referral, or text changes) that prevent an up-or-down adoption.
- Misunderstanding in markets between 'impeachment' (House majority) and 'removal' (Senate conviction), causing noisy pricing.
- Political bargains or external factors (legal developments, high-profile statements) that change members’ incentives before the vote.
Scenarios
Best case
**Decisive House passage today.** The House adopts articles of impeachment with a comfortable margin after the floor debate. The market rapidly reprices to reflect near-certainty of 'Yes' for the event. The Senate trial follows, but does not affect the 'impeachment' outcome. This outcome is consistent with my 85% assessment and would likely move the market to the 80–95% range post-roll-call.
Most likely
**House passes articles on or shortly after today's scheduled vote.** A small number of defections occur but do not overcome the majority; the House adopts articles of impeachment. The event resolves to 'Yes' and the Senate proceeds to a trial, but removal is a separate question. This scenario best matches the current procedural signals and my independent probability estimate.
Worst case
**Procedural or coalition failure prevents impeachment today and no further votes succeed before Jan 20, 2029.** A narrow majority fractures or leadership withdraws the motion, the House tables or refers the articles, or a last-minute political settlement averts an up-or-down vote. If the House never adopts articles before the term end, the market's 'Yes' resolves false and the outcome is 'No.' This is plausible but, given today's scheduling, reasonably unlikely.
More from this day
- PoliticsKalshi3mo
Will a cabinet member be impeached?
AI97%MKT5%Edge+92Hidden Gem**Very likely Yes.** A sitting Cabinet member (Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte) is already being tried in the Senate impeachment court, which in the Philippines follows a House impeachment — so the factual threshold for “impeached” has effectively been met and the probability of at least one Cabinet member being impeached before 2027 is extremely high.
- pop culturePolymarketEnded
"Evil Dead Burn" Opening Weekend Box Office (Lower Brackets)
AI8%MKT93%Edge-85HypedI think the chance that Evil Dead Burn opens below $16M is quite low, roughly 8%. The latest tracking and franchise comparisons point much closer to the mid-20Ms than the teens.
- techPolymarketEnded
Best AI model on July 18?
AI13%MKT92%Edge-79HypedI think claude-opus-4-6-thinking is a clear underdog here. It is currently near the top of the leaderboard, but it is not the leader today, and the latest frontier releases make it more likely to stay around second or third than to reclaim first.