How many Fed rate cuts in 2026?
Given the market price and the balance of macro risks, I assess roughly a three-in-four chance that the Fed will not cut rates in 2026; persistent inflationary pressures, a tight labor market, and the Fed's cautious bias make zero cuts the most likely outcome, but a significant downside shock or rapid disinflation could still force at least one cut.
Analysis
The market currently prices a fairly high probability that there will be no Fed cuts in 2026, and the volume on this market indicates meaningful trader engagement and confidence in that view; however, market-implied probabilities (e.g., fed funds futures and OIS markets) often move faster than fundamentals when new macro data or Fed communications arrive, so the market price should be treated as a strong but not definitive signal. Without live feeds of inflation, payrolls, and Fed communications for June 2026, the correct approach is to weigh likely macro trajectories: if inflation has decelerated steadily toward 2% with cooling labor-market indicators, the Fed would have scope to cut once or twice, but if inflation has remained stubbornly above target or growth has surprised on the upside, the Fed will stay on hold and avoid cuts. Historical Fed behavior shows a high reluctance to cut preemptively while inflation risks remain, and the Committee has tended to require clear evidence of growth slowing or a meaningful drop in inflation to justify easing, which supports a higher-than-even chance of zero cuts across a whole calendar year.
A key practical consideration is timing: the market resolves at year-end and counts any emergency cuts, but emergency cuts are rare and typically only occur during acute financial stress; absent a large shock to markets or the economy, any easing would almost certainly occur at a scheduled meeting late in the year rather than as an emergency action, which reduces the probability of surprise multiple cuts. Political and fiscal developments can also matter — tighter fiscal policy or easing of supply-side constraints would reduce the need for cuts, while large fiscal loosening or external shocks (sharp commodity moves, global growth collapse) could increase the chance of a cut. Given these countervailing influences, a probability modestly below the current market-implied 76.9% for zero cuts reflects reasonable caution: the path of inflation and labor-market data between now and December is the decisive driver, but the structural tendency of the Fed to avoid premature easing keeps no-cuts as the baseline outcome.
Finally, technical and market-driven factors (term premia, financial conditions, and credit spreads) can push the Fed toward or away from cuts independent of headline CPI; if financial conditions tighten significantly, the Fed may provide insurance with a cut, while a benign financial environment combined with sticky services inflation will make cuts politically and economically unlikely. In sum, absent a clear and sustained disinflation trend or a significant negative growth shock, the weight of historical practice and policy incentives favors no cuts in 2026, but tail risks on both sides justify a non-negligible chance of at least one cut before year-end.
Arguments
For
- The Fed historically waits for clear, sustained evidence of disinflation before switching to cuts, which favors zero cuts if inflation remains sticky.
- If labor markets remain tight with solid wage growth, the Committee will be reluctant to ease policy and will prioritize price stability.
- Absent a major negative shock to growth or financial stability, emergency cuts are unlikely and scheduled cuts require stronger reasons to occur.
- Fed communications over recent cycles have emphasized data-dependence and a bias against premature easing, supporting a no-cut outcome.
- High current real policy rates (if present) reduce the urgency for additional easing absent clear downside risks to growth.
Against
- If incoming inflation releases show rapid disinflation, the Fed may pivot to cuts to avoid over-tightening the economy.
- A significant downturn or financial market stress could force one or more emergency or scheduled cuts during 2026.
- Market-implied rates and financial conditions could price in cuts if investors become convinced that growth is weakening.
- Political or fiscal developments that materially boost demand could produce volatile data prompting a policy response in either direction.
Key drivers
- Headline and core inflation prints through the remainder of 2026, which determine whether policy is still restrictive relative to price dynamics.
- Labor market strength and wage growth data, since persistent tightness makes the Fed reluctant to ease.
- Federal Reserve communications and dot-plot signaling through FOMC statements and minutes, which shape expectations and conditionality for cuts.
- Financial conditions, including equity markets, credit spreads, and term premia, because sudden tightening could prompt insurance cuts.
- Real economic growth and leading indicators such as ISM, consumer spending, and business investment, which set the growth-side case for cuts.
- Geopolitical and external shocks (commodity spikes, global banking stress, or recession abroad) that could force emergency or unplanned easing.
Risk factors
- Faster-than-expected disinflation toward and below 2% could materially increase the chance of cuts.
- A sharp slowdown or recession in the U.S. would raise the probability of one or more cuts in 2026.
- A sudden banking or credit crisis could trigger emergency rate cuts that count toward the total.
- Marked easing in financial conditions driven by steep equity gains or narrowing spreads could reduce market pressure for cuts but also reverse rapidly.
- Unexpected fiscal expansion late in the year could keep inflation higher for longer and reduce cut likelihood.
- Significant data or communications surprises from the Fed could rapidly change market pricing and realized outcomes.
Scenarios
Best case
Zero cuts occur across 2026 because inflation remains at or above the Fed’s comfort range and the labor market stays resilient, reinforcing the Committee’s wait-and-see approach and leading to unchanged rates through year-end.
Most likely
The Fed holds rates for most of 2026 with no cuts, but markets remain sensitive to monthly data releases and to the risk of a single late-year cut if growth weakens or inflation falls faster than expected; this path preserves a dominant chance of zero cuts while keeping a reasonable tail probability of at least one cut.
Worst case
One or more cuts happen because a sharp growth slowdown, sudden tightening of financial conditions, or rapid disinflation forces the Fed into emergency or scheduled easing, resulting in at least one 25 bp cut (or an equivalent in smaller increments) that resolves the market to No.
More from this day
- HealthKalshi2y
What will the average number of measles cases be during Trump's term?
AI95%MKT34%Edge+61Hidden GemAssuming the market's 'Yes' means the 2025–2028 annual average exceeds 1,000 reported measles cases per year, I assess a very high probability (95%) that the average will be above that threshold given two consecutive >2,000-year starts and durable drivers keeping incidence elevated.
- sportsPolymarketEnded
UFC Freedom 250: Justin Gaethje vs. Ilia Topuria (Lightweight, Main Card)
AI22%MKT72%Edge-50HypedI assess Justin Gaethje has about a 22% chance to win; Ilia Topuria is the clear favorite due to youth, grappling, and stylistic matchup advantages, but Gaethje's finishing power and volatility keep his upset probability material.
- PoliticsKalshi2y
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce: Wedding attendees
AI65%MKT20%Edge+45Hidden GemBased on historical friendship patterns and how celebrity guest lists for close friends typically form, I assess a substantially greater than even chance that Blake Lively would attend a Taylor Swift–Travis Kelce wedding if it takes place — independent probability 65%.