How many Fed rate cuts in 2026?
I assess a roughly three-in-four chance that the Fed will not cut rates at all in 2026, reflecting continued emphasis on price stability, a still-tight labor market, and the market's strong current conviction against cuts while acknowledging nontrivial tail risks that could force at least one cut.
Analysis
Market-implied odds are strongly in favor of no cuts, with the Yes price near 79%, indicating broad participant belief that the Fed will sit pat through 2026; that high conviction reduces the scope for large informational surprises coming purely from market repricing, but it does not eliminate empirical drivers that could change the outlook. Absent fresh news in this briefing, the working baseline is that the Fed remains data-dependent and wary of easing prematurely after the multi-year fight against elevated inflation, so the threshold for loosening policy is still relatively high unless inflation shows durable reversion toward target or the labor market weakens materially.
Historically, the Fed has been reluctant to cut until there is clear evidence that inflation is sustainably at or below target or that the economy is deteriorating; a pattern of sticky services inflation or persistent wage pressures would keep cuts off the table for longer and supports the current market pricing for no cuts. Conversely, because monetary policy operates with long lags, a sharper-than-expected slowdown in activity, a spike in unemployment, or a rapid fall in inflation expectations could prompt the Fed to deliver emergency or scheduled cuts even late in the year, which is the main source of downside risk to the 'no cuts' outcome.
Taking those considerations together, I place the probability of no rate cuts in 2026 at 75%, slightly below the market-implied level to reflect non-zero chances of recession-driven or crisis-driven easing and the fact that a single shallow cut is easier for the Fed to implement than multiple cuts, but still reflecting strong evidence and incentives that argue for policy stability through the year.
Arguments
For
- If headline and core inflation remain at or above the Fed’s comfort range, the committee is likely to avoid cuts to ensure inflation is durably controlled.
- A still-tight labor market with continued job growth and wage gains would reduce the case for easing in 2026.
- The Fed has institutional incentives to avoid 'premature' easing after a prolonged tightening cycle to prevent re-igniting inflation expectations.
- Financial conditions not showing systemic stress means the Fed has less reason to provide asymmetric insurance via cuts.
- Market positioning already strongly favors no cuts, which raises the bar for newcomers to shift expectations without clear data changes.
Against
- Clear and sustained disinflation toward 2% would materially increase the probability of at least one cut in 2026.
- A meaningful rise in unemployment or a recession would create strong pressure for the Fed to cut even if inflation has not fully normalized.
- A banking or financial crisis could force the Fed into emergency easing that counts as cuts in 2026 under the market rules.
- Rapid improvement in productivity or a plunge in commodity prices could lower inflation faster than expected, prompting easing.
- External shocks that collapse global demand could transmit to the U.S. economy and change the committee’s policy calculus.
Key drivers
- Headline and core inflation readings through 2026, especially monthly PCE/CPI prints and their 3- to 6-month trends.
- Labor market strength as measured by payrolls, unemployment rate, and wage growth statistics.
- Federal Reserve communications including FOMC statements, press conferences, and updated dot plots signaling the committee's risk tolerance.
- Financial conditions including credit spreads, equity market volatility, and bank lending standards that can transmit to the real economy.
- GDP growth and incoming high-frequency indicators that reveal whether the economy is cooling toward recessionary territory.
- Market-based inflation expectations such as breakevens and inflation swaps that affect household and firm behavior.
- Fiscal policy developments that materially boost or drain aggregate demand during 2026.
- Geopolitical shocks or commodity price spikes that could re-accelerate inflation or alternatively severe global downturns that would pressure rates lower.
Risk factors
- A sudden economic slowdown or recession that materially increases unemployment and forces the Fed to cut.
- A string of lower-than-expected inflation prints demonstrating sustained disinflation toward 2% that justifies rate reductions.
- A financial-sector crisis or severe market dislocation prompting emergency rate cuts to stabilize conditions.
- Rapid decline in market inflation expectations that widens the policy error risk of maintaining restrictive rates.
- An unexpected fiscal contraction large enough to tip growth into negative territory and elicit Fed easing.
- Global demand collapse or a major trading partner recession that transmits to U.S. growth and inflation.
- A marked easing in wage growth and services inflation that reduces the Fed’s tolerance for holding restrictive policy.
- Political pressure or a materially changed composition of the FOMC that shifts policy preferences toward earlier easing.
Scenarios
Best case
For the Yes outcome, the best-case path is sustained disinflation that nevertheless remains above the Fed’s intolerance threshold while labor markets stay resilient and financial conditions remain orderly, allowing the Fed to keep policy unchanged all year and maintain a higher-for-longer stance without resorting to cuts.
Most likely
The most likely scenario is moderate growth with slowly falling inflation that keeps the Fed on hold for most of 2026 but leaves a non-negligible chance of a single late-year cut if inflation momentum and labor-market indicators soften materially, yielding a roughly three-in-four chance of no cuts as assessed here.
Worst case
For the No outcome, the worst-case path for the Yes side is a sharp recession or a systemic financial shock early or mid-2026 that forces one or more emergency or scheduled cuts, quickly converting the market to expect easing and making 'no cuts' impossible.
More from this day
- EconomicsKalshi3mo
When will Elon Musk become a trillionaire?
AI42%MKT95%Edge-53HypedI assess a ~42% chance Elon Musk will be a trillionaire on paper before 2027; the event is plausibly driven by a SpaceX valuation/IPO in the short window, but that outcome is far from certain and the market’s 95% pricing looks substantially overconfident.
- WorldKalshi72y
Will Elon Musk visit Mars in his lifetime?
AI45%MKT10%Edge+35Hidden GemIndependent assessment: there is a meaningful but not dominant chance Elon Musk will personally visit Mars before Aug 1, 2099 — I estimate it at 45% based on SpaceX's trajectory, Musk's personal incentives, and lifespan/health uncertainty.
- PoliticsKalshi1y
2026: Trump's dream year?
AI38%MKT9%Edge+29Hidden GemI assess a materially better-than-market chance that the 2026 “Trump” bull case will occur — not a coinflip majority outcome, but a substantial ~38% probability driven by a plausible Fed pivot, continued AI-driven earnings upside, and residual momentum in risk assets.