US real GDP growth in 2036?
I lean modestly toward a higher-growth outcome than the market implies, with the most likely bucket centered around 1.6% to 2.0% and meaningful tail probability in the 2.1% to 3.0% range. The market looks a bit too pessimistic if the question is a broad GDP-growth measure rather than a mature-economy slowdown case.
Analysis
The core problem is that the event is ambiguous about geography, and that matters enormously for a 2036 GDP-growth question. If this is a large developed economy, sub-2% growth is the natural baseline and the market’s No price would be defensible; if it is a faster-growing emerging economy, the 1.6% to 3.0% range looks more plausible and the market is likely underpricing the upper buckets. The supplied context points to economies like the Philippines and India, where long-run growth can remain materially above mature-market norms, even if it slows from recent peaks.
On the evidence provided, the single strongest signal is that long-run forecasts do not imply collapse by 2036; they imply moderation. Philippine medium-term commentary suggests growth staying around 5% to 6% in the nearer horizon before gradually slowing, and even the more cautious long-run studies still leave the economy expanding at solid rates by the mid-2030s. India’s medium-term outlook remains robust as well, with forecasts in the mid-to-high single digits now and only gradual deceleration expected later. That makes very low-growth outcomes, especially 0.0% or below, look far too extreme unless the market is specifically tied to a severely constrained economy or a recession-prone measurement definition.
Against that, the market’s 75% No price may be reflecting a generic assumption that GDP growth in 2036 will be below a high threshold or will fall into a narrow definition of “growth” used by the market. There is also a real risk that the event is country-specific in a way not fully captured by the context, which would justify a much lower Yes probability. Still, using the evidence supplied, the balance of probabilities favors a moderate-growth outcome over a flat or negative one, and the market appears somewhat too bearish on the middle buckets rather than outright wrong on the exact headline question.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: The provided long-run evidence implies continued expansion into 2036 rather than recession or zero growth.
- Arguments for Yes: Emerging-market examples in the context support the idea that growth can remain positive and meaningfully above zero even after slowing.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: If the event is effectively about a mature economy, growth around or below 2% is the base case and makes higher buckets less likely.
- Arguments against Yes: The ambiguity of the geography and metric means the market may already be pricing in the correct structural slowdown.
Key drivers
- The outcome depends heavily on whether the market refers to a mature economy or an emerging one, which creates a wide dispersion in likely 2036 growth rates.
- Long-run studies and forecasts suggest moderation, not stagnation, making mid-single-digit or low-single-digit positive growth more plausible than negative growth.
Risk factors
- If the market is tied to a developed economy or a strict definition that rarely exceeds 2%, the Yes probability is overstated.
- A structural slowdown from aging, productivity weakness, or policy shocks could push the outcome below the higher-probability buckets.
Scenarios
Best case
A fast-growing emerging economy remains on a healthy expansion path, with 2036 GDP growth landing in the 2.1% to 3.0% range or even higher.
Most likely
Growth moderates but stays positive, clustering around 1.6% to 2.5% rather than collapsing or accelerating sharply.
Worst case
The market is referring to a mature economy or a structurally weak economy, and 2036 growth lands in the 1.5% range or lower, making No prevail.
Outcomes
| Outcome | AI | MKT |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6% to 2.0% | 33% | 25% |
| 2.6% to 3.0% | 17% | 10% |
| 0.0% or Below | 5% | 8% |
| 2.1% to 2.5% | 14% | 8% |
| 1.1% to 1.5% | 11% | 5% |
More from this day
- PoliticsKalshi2y
Which agencies will Trump eliminate?
AI66%MKT23%Edge+43Hidden GemUSAID has a materially better-than-even chance of being functionally eliminated or dismantled during Trump’s term, even if the exact legal termination path is messy. My independent estimate is well above the market’s 23% Yes price because the political direction, staffing pressure, and prior Trump-era hostility all point toward a serious elimination attempt.
- pop culturePolymarketEnded
# of views of Grand Theft Auto VI Extended Look on week 1?
AI40%MKT79%Edge-39HypedThe market looks too bearish on the view count. Grand Theft Auto VI content is one of the few gaming videos that can plausibly clear 20 million views in a week even without a major celebrity or event tie-in, so I lean toward No.
- techPolymarket3mo
Highest Google Gemini score on Humanity’s Last Exam in 2026?
AI39%MKT76%Edge-37HypedGemini has been improving quickly on related reasoning benchmarks, but the only directly cited Humanity’s Last Exam result is still 37.5% without tools, which leaves a meaningful gap to 50%. I think the market is overestimating the chance of a threshold-crossing score by year-end, though the probability is still material.