How many Fed rate cuts in 2026?
The market is already strongly leaning toward no Fed cuts in 2026, and that remains the most likely outcome with only a handful of meetings left in the year. I think the chance of no cuts is high, but not ironclad, because a late-year slowdown or labor-market deterioration could still force the Fed to ease once.
Analysis
The current market price implies roughly an 85% chance that the Fed does not cut at all in 2026, and that seems broadly plausible given the information available today. With the date now in mid-August, most of the year has already passed, so the remaining path to a cut is fairly short: the Fed would need enough weakness in inflation, growth, or employment to justify easing before year-end. In that sense, the event is no longer a broad macro forecast for all of 2026, but a judgment on whether conditions worsen materially over just the final four and a half months.
Arguments for Yes are strong because the Fed usually needs a clear and sustained deterioration to change course, especially if inflation is still not fully contained. If growth remains moderate and the labor market only cools gradually, policymakers have little incentive to cut simply for caution, and they may prefer to keep real rates restrictive for longer. The fact that the market is already pricing a high probability of no cuts also suggests that the current data backdrop likely does not demand immediate easing, which supports the status quo through year-end.
Arguments against Yes are mainly about asymmetry: one weak stretch of data can change the entire calendar quickly, and the Fed has shown it will respond if the downside risks to employment or financial stability rise. Because emergency cuts also count, a sudden market disruption or sharp recession scare would instantly undermine the no-cut thesis. That said, absent a clear shock, the base case remains inertia, and the burden of proof for a cut is still on incoming data rather than on the Fed to act proactively.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: If current economic conditions remain only mildly soft, the Fed can leave rates unchanged all year without appearing overly tight.
- Arguments for Yes: The remaining 2026 meeting schedule is short enough that the data would need to deteriorate quickly to produce a cut.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: A single downside surprise in jobs, growth, or financial conditions could be enough to trigger at least one 25 bp cut.
- Arguments against Yes: The Fed has broad discretion to respond late in the year, including emergency action if stress emerges.
Key drivers
- The Fed still needs a meaningful deterioration in inflation or labor data to justify a 2026 cut.
- Only a few meetings remain, which compresses the window for a policy shift.
- Market pricing already reflects a strong expectation that rates stay unchanged through year-end.
Risk factors
- A sharp rise in unemployment could trigger a late-year easing cycle.
- A financial-market shock or recession scare could force an emergency or scheduled cut.
- A faster-than-expected disinflation trend could make holding rates steady look unnecessarily restrictive.
Scenarios
Best case
Inflation stays sticky enough and the labor market stays resilient enough that the Fed sees no reason to ease, so 2026 closes with zero cuts.
Most likely
The Fed stays on hold for most or all of 2026, and no cuts occur unless a late-year shock materially changes the data picture.
Worst case
Growth weakens sharply or financial conditions tighten abruptly, leading the Fed to cut once or more before year-end.
More from this day
- economyPolymarket10d
What will the median home value in Miami be on September 30?
AI98%MKT3%Edge+95Hidden GemMiami is overwhelmingly likely to finish below $1,017,000 on the official September 30 measure. Recent medians and listing data are far enough under the threshold that only a very large late-summer jump would threaten the Yes outcome.
- EconomicsKalshi9y
US real GDP growth in 2035?
AI79%MKT15%Edge+64Hidden GemMy independent view is that U.S. real GDP growth in 2035 is more likely to land in the 1.6% to 2.5% range than to be at or below zero, with a meaningful but not dominant chance of stronger growth. The market looks too pessimistic on the downside and slightly underweights a broad middle case of moderate expansion.
- FinancialsKalshi13y
Will OpenAI or Anthropic IPO first?
AI57%MKT92%Edge-35HypedAnthropic now looks slightly more likely to IPO before OpenAI, despite OpenAI’s early formal filing. The market appears to be overweighting OpenAI’s head start and underweighting the stronger recent timing signals around Anthropic.