Clarity Act (H.R.3633) signed into law in 2026?
The CLARITY Act is still moving through the Senate but has not yet cleared the remaining legislative steps needed to become law. The market’s 26.5% Yes price looks plausible, but I would still lean slightly below that because enactment requires multiple hard votes plus presidential signature before year-end.
Analysis
As of the latest available reporting, H.R. 3633 has passed the House and advanced through the Senate Banking Committee, but it has not been enacted. Congress.gov shows the bill’s latest action was House passage on July 17, 2025, and subsequent reporting confirms it moved to the Senate rather than becoming law. The current state of play therefore remains several steps short of final enactment.
The biggest argument for a Yes outcome is that the bill has already cleared an important bipartisan hurdle in the House and has also made progress in the Senate committee process. The House vote was strong at 294–134, and the Senate Banking Committee reportedly advanced a compromise version by 15–9 in May 2026, which suggests there is real institutional momentum behind a market-structure bill for digital assets. In addition, late-July reporting indicates Senate Republicans circulated updated merged text, which is consistent with active negotiations rather than legislative abandonment.
The biggest argument against Yes is procedural time and uncertainty. The bill still needs a full Senate floor vote, likely reconciliation between House and Senate versions, and then presidential signature, and the available reporting says no cloture motion had been filed and no final floor schedule had been set. That means the measure was still stuck before the most difficult enactment stages as of the latest news, leaving very limited time for all remaining steps to occur before December 31, 2026.
The market price of 26.5% Yes appears to reflect some expectation that the bill could still move if leadership prioritizes it, but also recognition that many late-session bills fail despite committee progress. My independent estimate is slightly lower because committee advancement is not the same as floor passage, and the combination of Senate floor hurdles, possible House-Senate differences, and the need for a presidential signature creates a substantial probability of stalling or slipping into 2027 without enactment.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: The bill already passed the House by a wide bipartisan margin, which lowers the barrier to final enactment.
- Arguments for Yes: Senate committee advancement and ongoing merged-text negotiations suggest the bill has active political support.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: The bill still needs a full Senate vote, reconciliation, and presidential signature, and none were completed in the latest reports.
- Arguments against Yes: Late-stage legislative delays are common, and the absence of a final floor schedule makes year-end enactment uncertain.
Key drivers
- House passage creates a real legislative base and shows bipartisan support.
- Senate committee advancement indicates the bill remains viable but not yet resolved.
- No reported final Senate floor vote or presidential signature has occurred yet.
- The remaining procedural steps are numerous and can easily consume the remaining calendar time.
Risk factors
- A sudden Senate floor schedule could accelerate passage faster than expected.
- Leadership agreement on a merged text could unlock quick final passage and signature.
Scenarios
Best case
Senate leaders bring up the merged bill quickly, both chambers resolve differences without major conflict, and the president signs it before year-end 2026.
Most likely
The bill continues to advance in fits and starts but fails to complete all required steps in time, so it remains pending rather than becoming law in 2026.
Worst case
The Senate never schedules a final vote, negotiations stall, or the chambers cannot reconcile differences, leaving the bill unenacted by December 31, 2026.
More from this day
- pop culturePolymarketEnded
"The Odyssey" total domestic gross by August 31? (Higher Strikes)
AI97%MKT4%Edge+93Hidden GemThe market should resolve to Yes, meaning the film finishes below 490m domestic by August 31. The current box-office pace is strong, but the remaining climb from the high-280m range to 490m would require an unusually large late-run expansion that is not supported by the reported trajectory.
- pop culturePolymarketEnded
"Spider-Man: Brand New Day" Opening Weekend Box Office (Higher Strikes)
AI86%MKT14%Edge+72Hidden GemThe most likely outcome is that Spider-Man: Brand New Day opens below $280 million domestically. Current tracking clusters in the $180M to $250M range, with even the most aggressive cited estimate still under the threshold.
- pop culturePolymarketEnded
"Spider-Man: Brand New Day" Opening Day Box Office
AI73%MKT4%Edge+69Hidden GemThe current tracking suggests a very large opening, but not necessarily one large enough to clear 120m on the opening day figure used by this market. I think less than 120m is more likely than the market price implies, with the center of gravity in the low-to-mid 100s rather than comfortably above the line.