Clarity Act signed into law in 2026?
The CLARITY Act is not yet law, but the bill has cleared the House and a Senate committee, so there is still a meaningful chance it finishes the remaining steps before year-end. The market’s 37.5% Yes price looks plausible given the legislative hurdles, but I would keep the probability modestly below half because the full Senate vote and reconciliation remain unresolved.
Analysis
The strongest available evidence says the CLARITY Act has not been signed into law yet, and as of late July 2026 it still lacks a full Senate floor vote and presidential approval. Congress.gov shows H.R. 3633 as passed by the House, while other current reporting says the bill advanced through the Senate Banking Committee and was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar, but still needs additional procedural steps before enactment. That means the event remains live, but the final hurdles are still substantial and time remains the key constraint.
Arguments for Yes center on the fact that the bill has already cleared two major stages and has bipartisan support, which is often the hardest part in a polarized Congress. The House vote was strong, the Senate Banking Committee advance was bipartisan, and the bill’s movement onto the Senate calendar means it is at least formally positioned for floor consideration. If Senate leadership prioritizes it and negotiates a compromise quickly, a year-end enactment is possible.
Arguments against Yes are stronger at this point because the remaining path is structurally difficult. Reporting indicates there is no Senate floor vote scheduled, no cloture motion filed, and unresolved issues remain around reconciling competing Senate language and an ethics provision. Even if the Senate passes something, House-Senate reconciliation and final presidential signature must still happen before the deadline, and the compressed calendar increases the chance that procedural delay rather than substantive opposition prevents enactment.
The market price of 37.5% Yes suggests traders see a real but limited chance of completion, and that lines up with the current legislative bottlenecks. A bill at this stage is not dead, but it is not close enough to be favored, especially with only a few months left in the year and no finalized floor action. My assessment is that the probability of enactment is somewhat below the market-implied level because the missing Senate floor step is still a major gating event, and the timeline is tight even if momentum improves quickly.
Arguments
For
- Arguments for Yes: The bill has bipartisan momentum, which improves the odds that leadership could find a path to floor consideration and final passage.
- Arguments for Yes: Placement on the Senate Legislative Calendar means the bill is officially eligible for further action rather than stalled at committee.
Against
- Arguments against Yes: The bill still needs a full Senate vote, House-Senate reconciliation, and the president’s signature, and none of those final steps have happened yet.
- Arguments against Yes: The absence of a scheduled floor vote so far suggests the legislative process is moving too slowly to guarantee completion before year-end.
Key drivers
- The bill has already passed the House and cleared a Senate committee, so only the later legislative steps remain.
- No Senate floor vote has been scheduled yet, which makes timely enactment difficult.
Risk factors
- Senate reconciliation between different committee versions could consume valuable time and create new points of disagreement.
- Calendar pressure, recess timing, and procedural delays could prevent final passage even if there is enough support in principle.
Scenarios
Best case
Senate leadership prioritizes the bill, negotiates a unified version quickly, both chambers pass it before the end of the year, and the president signs it into law.
Most likely
The bill continues to attract support and remains a serious contender, but floor timing, reconciliation, and calendar constraints keep it from becoming law in 2026.
Worst case
The bill stalls on the Senate calendar, procedural disputes or competing priorities consume the remaining session time, and the year ends before final passage.
More from this day
- pop culturePolymarketEnded
# of views of MrBeast video week 1?
AI12%MKT83%Edge-71HypedMrBeast’s next full upload is much more likely to clear 40 million views in its first week than to stay below it. The market’s Yes price looks directionally right, and I assign a high probability to No being wrong because recent launches have repeatedly opened in the tens of millions within days.
- PoliticsKalshi2y
Which agencies will Trump eliminate?
AI93%MKT29%Edge+64Hidden GemYes is highly likely. The available reporting indicates USAID has already been functionally dismantled and absorbed into the State Department, leaving only a thin legal-shell question about whether the market requires formal statutory elimination.
- economyPolymarketEnded
Largest Company end of July?
AI77%MKT26%Edge+51Hidden GemNVIDIA is favored to be the largest company by market cap on July 31, but the lead is not secure. The market price near 78.5% looks directionally reasonable because NVIDIA appears to have the edge, yet the close Apple gap and volatile last-week pricing leave meaningful downside risk.